Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Forschungsdesign

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

ALLEA, A. E. A. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/european-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity_horizon_en.pdf

Antoniou, E. E., Draper, H., Reed, K., Burls, A., Southwood, T. R., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041871

Aryani, A. (2015). Data Description Registry Interoperability WG: Interlinking Method and Specification of Cross-Platform Discovery. https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00003

Bechmann, A., & Kim, J. Y. (2019). Big Data. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_18-1

Boynton, P. M. (2017). The Research Companion: A Practical Guide for Those in the Social Sciences, Health and Development (P. M. Boynton, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaen.2005.11.007

Brabin, L., Roberts, S., Tully, M., Vail, A., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 1.: Scientific Reviews: What Should Ethics Committees Be Looking For? Research Ethics, 5(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500109

Brotsky, S. R., & Giles, D. (2007). Inside the “pro-ana” community: a covert online participant observation. Eating Disorders, 15(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640260701190600

Cutcliffe, J. R., & Ramcharan, P. (2002). Leveling the Playing Field? Exploring the Merits of the Ethics-as-Process Approach for Judging Qualitative Research Proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 12(7), 1000–1010.

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). (2019). Leitlinien zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis: Kodex (p. 31). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. https://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/rechtliche_rahmenbedingungen/gute_wissenschaftliche_praxis/kodex_gwp.pdf

DuBois, J. (2006). Ethics in behavioral and social science research. In A. Smith Iltis (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 102–120). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203799277-12/ethics-behavioral-social-science-research-james-dubois

Flick, C. (2016). Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Research Ethics, 12(1), pp 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115599568

Forsyth, D. R. (1981). Moral judgment: The influence of ethical ideology. Personalty and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 218–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728172006

Forsyth, D. R., & Pope, W. R. (1984). Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research: Multidimensional Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1365

Götze, A., & Wahl, A. (2020). Psychische Gesundheit: Eine heikle Thematik in der empirischen Umfrageforschung? : zur Validierung des Crosswise Modells. https://doi.org/10.18419/OPUS-11083

Gamble, C., & Mark, M. (2009). Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and Ethics. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 198–213). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n13

Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G., & Booth, A. (2017). Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), 195. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082

Heise, N. (2017). Warum das Rad neu erfinden? Gedanken zur Diskussion um Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft in Anknüpfung an den Beitrag von Daniela Schlütz und Wiebke Möhring in M&K 4/2016. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-766

Hesse-Biber, S., & Griffin, A. J. (2013). Internet-Mediated Technologies and Mixed Methods Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812451791

Hessler, G. (2012). Konstellationen von Wissenschaft und Praxis in der empirischen Sozialforschung. In K. Unzicker & G. Hessler (Eds.), Öffentliche Sozialforschung und Verantwortung für die Praxis (pp. 157–177). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94221-6_8

Koepsell, D., Brinkman, W. P., & Pont, S. (2014). Human research ethics committees in technical universities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540596

Lahman, M. K. E. (2017). Ethics in Social Science Research: Becoming Culturally Responsive (1st ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/ethics-in-social-science-research/book249319

Markham, A. (2006). Ethic as Method, Method as Ethic: A Case for Reflexivity in Qualitative ICT Research. Journal of Information Ethics, 15(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.15.2.37

Matthes, J., Marquart, F., Naderer, B., Arendt, F., Schmuck, D., & Adam, K. (2015). Questionable Research Practices in Experimental Communication Research: A Systematic Analysis From 1980 to 2013. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096334

Murphy, J., Link, M. W., Childs, J. H., Tesfaye, C. L., Dean, E., Stern, M., Pasek, J., Cohen, J., Callegaro, M., & Harwood, P. (2014). Social Media in Public Opinion Research: Executive Summary of the Aapor Task Force on Emerging Technologies in Public Opinion Research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(4), 788–794. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu053

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-Research: Ethics, Security, Design, and Control in Psychological Research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161. SocINDEX with Full Text. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00254

Oldendick, R. W. (2012). Survey Research Ethics. In L. Gideon (Ed.), Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences (pp. 23–35). Springer New York.

Oliver, P. (2010). The Student’s Guide To Research Ethics (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

Perrault, E. K., & Keating, D. M. (2018). Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617738846

Resnik, D. B. (Ed.). (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting People, Advancing Science, Promoting Trust (1st ed., Vol. 74). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8

Scheliga, K., & Friesike, S. (2014). Putting open science into practice: A social dilemma? First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i9.5381

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2018). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Negotiating ethics and method in communication research practice. Studies in Communication | Media, 7(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-1-31

Schwartz, R. (2009). On Ethics in Social Science Research. In D. M. Mertens & P. Spear (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 189–197). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n12

Singer, E. (1978). The Effect of Informed Consent Procedures on Respondents’ Reactions to Surveys. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(1), 49–57. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/208713

Sonenshein, S., & DeCelles, K. (2017). Mixed Methodologies, Full-Cycle Research, and the Shortcomings of Behavioral Ethics. In P. H. Werhane, R. E. Freeman, & S. Dmytriyev (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility (1st ed., pp. 191–198). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584385.013

Vail, A., Tully, M., Brabin, L., Roberts, S., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 2.: Are the Study Aims Justified and is the Design Appropriate? Research Ethics, 5(2), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500212

Forschungsdesign

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende