Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Forschungsdesign

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

ALLEA, A. E. A. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/european-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity_horizon_en.pdf

Antoniou, E. E., Draper, H., Reed, K., Burls, A., Southwood, T. R., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041871

Aryani, A. (2015). Data Description Registry Interoperability WG: Interlinking Method and Specification of Cross-Platform Discovery. https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00003

Bechmann, A., & Kim, J. Y. (2019). Big Data. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_18-1

Boynton, P. M. (2017). The Research Companion: A Practical Guide for Those in the Social Sciences, Health and Development (P. M. Boynton, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaen.2005.11.007

Brabin, L., Roberts, S., Tully, M., Vail, A., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 1.: Scientific Reviews: What Should Ethics Committees Be Looking For? Research Ethics, 5(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500109

Brotsky, S. R., & Giles, D. (2007). Inside the “pro-ana” community: a covert online participant observation. Eating Disorders, 15(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640260701190600

Cutcliffe, J. R., & Ramcharan, P. (2002). Leveling the Playing Field? Exploring the Merits of the Ethics-as-Process Approach for Judging Qualitative Research Proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 12(7), 1000–1010.

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). (2019). Leitlinien zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis: Kodex (p. 31). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. https://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/rechtliche_rahmenbedingungen/gute_wissenschaftliche_praxis/kodex_gwp.pdf

DuBois, J. (2006). Ethics in behavioral and social science research. In A. Smith Iltis (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 102–120). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203799277-12/ethics-behavioral-social-science-research-james-dubois

Flick, C. (2016). Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Research Ethics, 12(1), pp 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115599568

Forsyth, D. R. (1981). Moral judgment: The influence of ethical ideology. Personalty and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 218–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728172006

Forsyth, D. R., & Pope, W. R. (1984). Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research: Multidimensional Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1365

Gamble, C., & Mark, M. (2009). Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and Ethics. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 198–213). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n13

Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G., & Booth, A. (2017). Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), 195. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082

Heise, N. (2017). Warum das Rad neu erfinden? Gedanken zur Diskussion um Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft in Anknüpfung an den Beitrag von Daniela Schlütz und Wiebke Möhring in M&K 4/2016. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-766

Hesse-Biber, S., & Griffin, A. J. (2013). Internet-Mediated Technologies and Mixed Methods Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812451791

Hessler, G. (2012). Konstellationen von Wissenschaft und Praxis in der empirischen Sozialforschung. In K. Unzicker & G. Hessler (Eds.), Öffentliche Sozialforschung und Verantwortung für die Praxis (pp. 157–177). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94221-6_8

Koepsell, D., Brinkman, W. P., & Pont, S. (2014). Human research ethics committees in technical universities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540596

Lahman, M. K. E. (2017). Ethics in Social Science Research: Becoming Culturally Responsive (1st ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/ethics-in-social-science-research/book249319

Matthes, J., Marquart, F., Naderer, B., Arendt, F., Schmuck, D., & Adam, K. (2015). Questionable Research Practices in Experimental Communication Research: A Systematic Analysis From 1980 to 2013. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096334

Murphy, J., Link, M. W., Childs, J. H., Tesfaye, C. L., Dean, E., Stern, M., Pasek, J., Cohen, J., Callegaro, M., & Harwood, P. (2014). Social Media in Public Opinion Research: Executive Summary of the Aapor Task Force on Emerging Technologies in Public Opinion Research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(4), 788–794. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu053

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-Research: Ethics, Security, Design, and Control in Psychological Research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161. SocINDEX with Full Text. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00254

Oliver, P. (2010). The Student’s Guide To Research Ethics (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

Perrault, E. K., & Keating, D. M. (2018). Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617738846

Resnik, D. B. (Ed.). (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting People, Advancing Science, Promoting Trust (1st ed., Vol. 74). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8

Scheliga, K., & Friesike, S. (2014). Putting open science into practice: A social dilemma? First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i9.5381

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2018). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Negotiating ethics and method in communication research practice. Studies in Communication | Media, 7(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-1-31

Schwartz, R. (2009). On Ethics in Social Science Research. In D. M. Mertens & P. Spear (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 189–197). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n12

Singer, E. (1978). The Effect of Informed Consent Procedures on Respondents’ Reactions to Surveys. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(1), 49–57. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/208713

Sonenshein, S., & DeCelles, K. (2017). Mixed Methodologies, Full-Cycle Research, and the Shortcomings of Behavioral Ethics. In P. H. Werhane, R. E. Freeman, & S. Dmytriyev (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility (1st ed., pp. 191–198). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584385.013

Vail, A., Tully, M., Brabin, L., Roberts, S., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 2.: Are the Study Aims Justified and is the Design Appropriate? Research Ethics, 5(2), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500212