Forschungspraktiken Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.
Bos, J. (2020). Research ethics for students in the social sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6 Braun, R., Ravn, T., & Frankus, E. (2020). What constitutes expertise in research ethics and integrity? Research Ethics, 16(1–2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898402 Bruton, S. V., Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2020). Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(3), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619894435 Buchanan, E. A., & Ess, C. M. (2009). Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 39(3), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/1713066.1713069 Cox, S. M., McDonald, M., & Townsend, A. (2020). Epistemic Strategies in Ethical Review: REB Members’ Experiences of Assessing Probable Impacts of Research for Human Subjects. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(5), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619872369 Custers, B., Van der Hof, S., & Schermer, B. (2014). Privacy Expectations of Social Media Users: The Role of Informed Consent in Privacy Policies: Privacy Expectations of Social Media Users. Policy & Internet, 6(3), 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI366 Dienlin, T., Johannes, N., Bowman, N. D., Masur, P. K., Engesser, S., Kümpel, A. S., Lukito, J., Bier, L. M., Zhang, R., Johnson, B. K., Huskey, R., Schneider, F. M., Breuer, J., Parry, D. A., Vermeulen, I., Fisher, J. T., Banks, J., Weber, R., Ellis, D. A., … de Vreese, C. (2020). An Agenda for Open Science in Communication. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz052 Elovici, Y., Fire, M., Herzberg, A., & Shulman, H. (2014). Ethical Considerations when Employing Fake Identities in Online Social Networks for Research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9473-0 Gorup, M. (2017). The Respect Project in the Rear-View Mirror: Past, Present and Future of International Professional and Ethics Guidelines for Social Science Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 157–176). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001013 Helgesson, G. (2020). Authorship order and effects of changing bibliometrics practices. Research Ethics, 16(1–2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898403 Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2008). Deception in Experiments: Revisiting the Arguments in Its Defense. Ethics & Behavior, 18(1), 59–92. Academic Search Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420701712990 Hessler, G. (2012). Konstellationen von Wissenschaft und Praxis in der empirischen Sozialforschung. In K. Unzicker & G. Hessler (Eds.), Öffentliche Sozialforschung und Verantwortung für die Praxis (pp. 157–177). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94221-6_8 Iphofen, R. (2017). Achieving Consensus in Research Ethics: An Interim Conclusion and Some Recommendations. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 211–225). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001017 Iphofen, R. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (1–2). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7 John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953 Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological Research Online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs’ Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59(2), 105–117. ERIC. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ684234&site=ehost-live Leonelli, S., Lovell, R., Wheeler, B. W., Fleming, L., & Williams, H. (2021). From FAIR data to fair data use: Methodological data fairness in health-related social media research. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 20539517211010310. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211010310 MacNeill, K., Bolt, B., Barrett, E., McPherson, M., Sierra, M., Miller, S., Ednie-Brown, P., & Wilson, C. (2021). An ethical engagement: creative practice research, the academy and professional codes of conduct. Research Ethics, 17(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120915950 Matthes, J., Marquart, F., Naderer, B., Arendt, F., Schmuck, D., & Adam, K. (2015). Questionable Research Practices in Experimental Communication Research: A Systematic Analysis From 1980 to 2013. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096334 McKee, H. A., & Porter, J. E. (2009). The Ethics of Internet Research: A Rhetorical, Casebased Process. Peter Lang. DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2010.03.003 Neuhaus, F., & Webmoor, T. (2012). Agile ethics for massified research and visualization. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.616519 Parry, J. (2017). Developing standards for research practice: some issues for consideration. In Ron Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground : Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences: Vol. First edition. Emerald Publishing Limited; eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost). https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001008/full/html Pelikan, K., Jeffery, R., & Roelcke, T. (2021). ‘The time where the British took the lead is over’: ethical aspects of writing in complex research partnerships. Research Ethics, 17(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120915253 Phillips, L. G., & Zavros, A. (2012). Researchers as participants, participants as researchers. In W. Midgley, P. A. Danaher, & M. Baguley (Eds.), The role of participants in education research: ethics, epistemologies, and methods (pp. 52–63). Routledge. Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1 Podschuweit, N. (2021). How ethical challenges of covert observations can be met in practice. Research Ethics, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211008218 Puschmann, C. (2019). An end to the wild west of social media research: a response to Axel Bruns. Information, Communication & Society, 22(11), 1582–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2019.1646300 Recuber, T. (2015). From obedience to contagion: Discourses of power in Milgram, Zimbardo, and the Facebook experiment. Research Ethics, 12(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115579533 Risi, E., & Di Fraia, G. (2023). Collect and Handle Personal Social Media Data. Ethical Issues of an Empirical Internet Research. Comunicazioni Sociali, 2, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.26350/001200_000181 Rollin, B. E. (Ed.). (2006). Ethics and Research on Human Beings. In Science and Ethics (pp. 66–98). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617218.005 Sacco, D. F., Bruton, S. V., & Brown, M. (2018). In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617743834 Samuel, G., Derrick, G. E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The Ethics Ecosystem: Personal Ethics, Network Governance and Regulating Actors Governing the Use of Social Media Research Data. Minerva, 57(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09368-3 Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2017). Das Rad rollt! Eine Antwort und weiterführende Überlegungen zu dem Diskussionsbeitrag von Nele Heise in diesem Heft. Medien Und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 779–783. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-779 Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2018). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Negotiating ethics and method in communication research practice. Studies in Communication | Media, 7(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-1-31 Silverman, H., Strosberg, M., Luna, F., Philpott, S., & Hemmerle, C. A. (2013). An analysis of online courses in research ethics in the Fogarty-sponsored bioethics training programs. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 8(5), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.59 Singer, E. (1984). Public Reactions to Some Ethical Issues of Social Research: Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 501–509. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1086/208986 Speiglman, R., & Spear, P. (2009). The Role of Institutional Review Boards: Ethics: Now You See Them, Now You Don’t. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 121–134). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-handbook-of-social-research-ethics/n8.xml Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 17(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767 Vermeulen, I., & Hartmann, T. (2015). Questionable Research and Publication Practices in Communication Science. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096331 Williamson, V., Murphy, D., Castro, C., Vermetten, E., Jetly, R., & Greenberg, N. (2021). Moral injury and the need to carry out ethically responsible research. Research Ethics, 17(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120969743 Zimmerman, S. V. (2017). The Canadian Experience: A Response to ‘Developing Standards for Research Practice: Some Issues for Consideration’ by James Parry. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 103–109). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001009