Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Entscheidungsfindung

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Annette, M., & Elizabeth, B. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

Antoniou, E. E., Draper, H., Reed, K., Burls, A., Southwood, T. R., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041871

Azoury, M., Kaissi, B., & Attieh, L. (2018). Research Ethics. In J. Marx Gómez & S. Mouselli (Eds.), Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment (pp. 111–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4_7

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1979). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/filmuniversitaet/detail.action?docID=5763592

Blay, A. D., Gooden, E. S., Mellon, M. J., & Stevens, D. E. (2018). The Usefulness of Social Norm Theory in Empirical Business Ethics Research: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3286-4

Bleisch, B., Huppenbauer, M., & Baumberger, C. (2021). Ethische Entscheidungsfindung: Ein Handbuch für die Praxis (3., vollständig überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage). Nomos Verlag.

Boyd, K. M. (2017). Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 55–60). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001006

Carter, C. J., Koene, A., Perez, E., Statache, R., Adolphs, S., O’Malley, C., Rodden, T., & McAuley, D. (2016). Understanding academic attitudes towards the ethical challenges posed by social media research. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 45(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874268

Cox, S. M., McDonald, M., & Townsend, A. (2020). Epistemic Strategies in Ethical Review: REB Members’ Experiences of Assessing Probable Impacts of Research for Human Subjects. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(5), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619872369

Gerdon, F., Bach, R. L., Kern, C., & Kreuter, F. (2022). Social impacts of algorithmic decision-making: A research agenda for the social sciences. Big Data & Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221089305

Giaxoglou, K. (2017). Reflections on internet research ethics from language-focused research on web-based mourning: revisiting the private/public distinction as a language ideology of differentiation. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2/3), 229–250. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1037

Godulla, A. (2019). Ethische Aspekte der Visuellen Kommunikationsforschung. In K. Lobinger (Ed.), Handbuch Visuelle Kommunikationsforschung (pp. 703–721). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06508-9_33

Gorup, M. (2017). The Respect Project in the Rear-View Mirror: Past, Present and Future of International Professional and Ethics Guidelines for Social Science Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 157–176). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001013

Hunter, R. (2017). Research as a Social Practice: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 47–54). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001005

Kvalnes, Ø. (Ed.). (2020). Digital Dilemmas: Exploring Social Media Ethics in Organizations (1. Edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45927-7

McKee, H. A., & Porter, J. E. (2009). The Ethics of Internet Research: A Rhetorical, Casebased Process. Peter Lang. DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2010.03.003

Mepham, B., Kaiser, M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., & Millar, K. (2006). Ethical Matrix Manual. LEI. https://edepot.wur.nl/216589

Nelson, R. M., Beauchamp, T., Miller, V. A., Reynolds, W., Ittenbach, R. F., & Luce, M. F. (2011). The Concept of Voluntary Consent. American Journal of Bioethics, 11(8), 6–16. Academic Search Complete. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583318

Pauwels, L. (2008). Taking and Using. Ethical Issues of Photographs for Research Purposes. Visual Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 243–257. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15551390802415071

Phelan, S. K., & Kinsella, E. A. (2013). Picture This . . . Safety, Dignity, and Voice—Ethical Research With Children: Practical Considerations for the Reflexive Researcher. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412462987

Reid, C., Calia, C., Guerra, C., Grant, L., Anderson, M., Chibwana, K., Kawale, P., & Amos, A. (2021). Ethics in global research: Creating a toolkit to support integrity and ethical action throughout the research journey. Research Ethics, 17(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016121997522

Resnik, D. B. (1998). The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. Taylor & Francis Group.

Resnik, D. B. (2012). Ethical Virtues in Scientific Research. Accountability in Research, 19(6), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2012.728908

Samuel, G., Derrick, G. E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The Ethics Ecosystem: Personal Ethics, Network Governance and Regulating Actors Governing the Use of Social Media Research Data. Minerva, 57(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09368-3

Slattery, M., Ehrlich, C., Norwood, M., Amsters, D., & Allen, G. (2023). Disability Research in Australia: Deciding to Be a Research Participant and the Experience of Participation. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 18(1–2), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221147350

Sonenshein, S., & DeCelles, K. (2017). Mixed Methodologies, Full-Cycle Research, and the Shortcomings of Behavioral Ethics. In P. H. Werhane, R. E. Freeman, & S. Dmytriyev (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility (1st ed., pp. 191–198). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584385.013

Stenmark, C. K., & Miller, R. (2021). A Little Goes a Long Way: Adapting an Ethics Training Program to Work for Smaller Universities. 16(4), 461–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211007216

Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 17(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767

Vargas, L. A., & Montoya, M. E. (2009). Involving Minors in Research: Ethics and Law Within Multicultural Settings. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 489–506). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n31

franzke, aline shakti, Muis, I., & Schäfer, M. T. (2021). Data Ethics Decision Aid (DEDA): a dialogical framework for ethical inquiry of AI and data projects in the Netherlands. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(3), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09577-5