Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Sozialwissenschaften

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Averbeck-Lietz, S., & Sanko, C. (2016). Wissenschafts- und Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. In S. Averbeck-Lietz & M. Meyen (Eds.), Handbuch nicht standardisierte Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 125–136). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01656-2_8

Bos, J. (2020). Research ethics for students in the social sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6

Boyd, K. M. (2017). Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 55–60). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001006

Burr, J., & Reynolds, P. (2010). The Wrong Paradigm? Social Research and the Predicates of Ethical Scrutiny. Research Ethics, 6(4), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600404

Calvey, D. (2019). Deception. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_15-1

Carniel, J., Hickey, A., Southey, K., Brömdal, A., Crowley-Cyr, L., Eacersall, D., Farmer, W., Gehrmann, R., Machin, T., & Pillay, Y. (2022). The ethics review and the humanities and social sciences: disciplinary distinctions in ethics review processes. Research Ethics, 174701612211472. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221147202

Carpenter, D. (2017). The Quest for Generic Ethics Principles in Social Science Research. In Ron Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground : Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences: Vol. First edition. Emerald Publishing Limited; eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001001

Charlesworth, A. (2012). Data Protection, Freedom of Information and Ethical Review Committees. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 85–103. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.637572

Döring, N., & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungs- und Wissenschaftsethik. In N. Döring & J. Bortz, Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften (pp. 121–139). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5_4

Dingwall, R., Iphofen, R., Lewis, J., Oates, J., & Emmerich, N. (2017). Towards Common Principles for Social Science Research Ethics: A Discussion Document for the Academy of Social Sciences. In R. I. FAcSS (Ed.), Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity (Vol. 1, pp. 111–123). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001010

Dittmer, C., & Lorenz, D. F. (2018). Forschen im Kontext von Vulnerabilität und extremem Leid – Ethische Fragen der sozialwissenschaftlichen Katastrophenforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3116

Emmerich, N. (2017). Remaking Research Ethics in the Social Sciences: Anthropological Reflections on a Collaborative Process. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 125–148). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001011

Endres, S., & Filipovic, A. (2018). „Prinzipien für Befragungen zu moralisch polarisierenden Fragestellungen“ Für das Projekt „MeKriF - Flucht als Krise. Mediale Krisendarstellung, Medienumgang und Bewältigung durch Heranwachsende am Beispiel Flucht“. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327437473_Prinzipien_fur_Befragungen_zu_moralisch_polarisierenden_Fragestellungen

Engel, U., & Dahlhaus, L. (2021). Data quality and privacy concerns in digital trace data. In U. Engel, A. Quan-Haase, S. X. Liu, & L. Lyberg, Handbook of Computational Social Science, Volume 1 (pp. 343–362). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003024583-23

European Commission. Directorate-General for Research. (2011). European textbook on ethics in research. Publications Office. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/12567a07-6beb-4998-95cd-8bca103fcf43/language-en

Flynn, L., & Goldsmith, R. (2013). Case Studies for Ethics in Academic Research in the Social Sciences. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452269986

Freedland, K. E., & Carney, R. M. (1992). Data management and accountability in behavioral and biomedical research. American Psychologist, 47(5), 640–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.5.640

Giraud, C., Cioffo, G. D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M., & Ramirez Chaves, C. (2019). Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750081

Gorup, M. (2017). The Respect Project in the Rear-View Mirror: Past, Present and Future of International Professional and Ethics Guidelines for Social Science Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 157–176). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001013

Guenther, K. M. (2009). The politics of names: Rethinking the methodological and ethical significance of naming people, organizations, and places. Qualitative Research, 9(4), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109337872

Hammersley, M. (2017). Communitarian Principles That Will Increase the Damage Done by Ethical Regulation? A Response to ‘The Quest for Generic Ethics Principles in Social Science Research’ by David Carpenter. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 19–27). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001002

Heise, N. (2015). Big Data – small problems? Ethische Dimensionen der Forschung mit Online-Kommunikationsspuren. In Digitale Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (p. pp 39-58). ifpuk - Institute for Media and Communication Studies at FU Berlin. http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44045

Heise, N., & Schmidt, J.-H. (2014). Ethik der Online-Forschung. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung. Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 519–539). von Halem.

Hessler, G. (2012). Konstellationen von Wissenschaft und Praxis in der empirischen Sozialforschung. In K. Unzicker & G. Hessler (Eds.), Öffentliche Sozialforschung und Verantwortung für die Praxis (pp. 157–177). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94221-6_8

Hochfellner, D., Muller, D., & Schmucker, A. (2014). Privacy in Confidential Administrative Micro Data: Implementing Statistical Disclosure Control in a Secure Computing Environment. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(5), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614552799

Hosseini, M., Wieczorek, M., & Gordijn, B. (2022). Ethical Issues in Social Science Research Employing Big Data. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(3), 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00380-7

Hunter, R. (2017). Research as a Social Practice: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 47–54). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001005

Israel, M. (2019). Research Ethics and Integrity for Social Scientists: Beyond Regulatory Compliance (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473910096

Jennings, S. (2012). Response to Schrag: What are ethics committees for anyway? A defence of social science research ethics review. Research Ethics, 8(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016112445423

Jensen, U. (2019). Forschungsdaten und Forschungsdatenmanagement in den Sozialwissenschaften. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (p. pp 13-36). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84742233

Jensen, U., Zenk-Möltgen, W., & Wasner, C. (2019). Metadatenstandards im Kontext sozialwissenschaftlicher Daten. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (pp. 151–178). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84742233

Kämper, E. (2016). Risiken sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschung? Forschungsethik, Datenschutz und Schutz von Persönlichkeitsrechten in den Sozial- und Verhaltenswissenschaften. RatSWD Working Paper Series, 255. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.21

Krieger, B., Grubmüller, V., & Schäfer, C. (2014). Ethische Herausforderungen bei der sozialwissenschaftlichen Analyse von Social-Media-Inhalten. SWS-Rundschau, 2, 201–2016. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/48043/ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf

Lahman, M. K. E. (2017). Ethics in Social Science Research: Becoming Culturally Responsive (1st ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/ethics-in-social-science-research/book249319

Lauber-Rönsberg, A. (2018). Data Protection Laws, Research Ethics and Social Sciences. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. 29–44). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_4

Leslie, D. (2023). The Ethics of Computational Social Science. In E. Bertoni, M. Fontana, L. Gabrielli, S. Signorelli, & M. Vespe (Eds.), Handbook of Computational Social Science for Policy (pp. 57–104). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16624-2_4

Lombardo, G. (2017). The Social Sciences and Ethical Protocols and Standards for Research in Social Sciences Today. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 177–184). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001014

Macdonald, S. (2017). Embedded Ethics and Research Integrity: A Response to ‘The Quest for Generic Ethics Principles in Social Science Research’ by David Carpenter. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 29–35). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001003

Mamotte, N., & Wassenaar, D. (2009). Ethics Review in a Developing Country: A Survey of South African Social Scientists’ Experiences. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(4), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2009.4.4.69

Maring, M. (2011). Forschungs- und Wissenschaftsethik. In R. Stoecker, C. Neuhäuser, M.-L. Raters, & F. Koberling (Eds.), Handbuch Angewandte Ethik (pp. 165–170). J. B. Metzler. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-476-05320-6_4

Nakray, K., Alston, M., & Whittenbury, K. (Eds.). (2015). Social Science Research Ethics for a Globalizing World: Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880020

Netscher, S., & Trixa, J. (2019). Forschungsdatenmanagement in der Sekundäranalyse. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (pp. 135–150). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84742233

Neuhaus, F., & Webmoor, T. (2012). Agile ethics for massified research and visualization. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.616519

Oellers, C., & Wegner, E. (2009). Does Germany Need a (New) Research Ethics for the Social Sciences? (86; RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 86). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://www.ratswd.de/download/RatSWD_WP_2009/RatSWD_WP_86.pdf

Phillips, L. G., & Zavros, A. (2012). Researchers as participants, participants as researchers. In W. Midgley, P. A. Danaher, & M. Baguley (Eds.), The role of participants in education research: ethics, epistemologies, and methods (pp. 52–63). Routledge.

Plutzer, E. (2019). Privacy, Sensitive Questions, and Informed Consent. Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(Suppl. 1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz017

Puschmann, C. (2019). An end to the wild west of social media research: a response to Axel Bruns. Information, Communication & Society, 22(11), 1582–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2019.1646300

Rat Für Sozial- Und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD). (2023). Handreichung Umgang mit der Kenntnisnahme von Straftaten im Rahmen der Durchführung von Forschungsvorhaben. RatSWD Output Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.74

Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD) (Ed.). (2017). Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften. 9(5). https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.1

Robertson, M. (2014). The case for ethics review in the social sciences: Drawing from practice at Queen Mary University of London. Research Ethics, 10(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016113511177

Sacco, D. F., Bruton, S. V., & Brown, M. (2018). In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617743834

Schaar, K. (2016). Was hat die Wissenschaft beim Datenschutz künftig zu beachten? Allgemeine und spezifische Änderungen beim Datenschutz im Wissenschaftsbereich durch die neue Europäische Datenschutzgrundverordnung. RatSWD Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.19

Sherwood, G., & Parsons, S. (2021). Negotiating the practicalities of informed consent in the field with children and young people: learning from social science researchers. 17(4), 448–463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211014941

Sleat, M. (2017). Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 37–46). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001004

Van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2017). About ‘Othering’ Ourselves in a System with Discrepant Values: The Research Ethics Review Process Today. In Ron Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground : Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences: Vol. First edition (pp. 61–75). Emerald Publishing Limited; eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001007

Von Unger, H., & Narimani, P. (2012). Ethische Reflexivität im Forschungsprozess: Herausforderungen in der Partizipativen Forschung. WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP I 2012-304, Berlin. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/70197

Von Unger, H., & Simon, D. (2016). Ethikkommissionen in den Sozialwissenschaften - Historische Entwicklungen und Internationale Kontroversen (RatSWD Working Paper 253). German Data Forum (RatSWD). https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/rswrswwps/rswwps253.htm

Von Unger, H., Dilger, H., & Schönhuth, M. (2016). Ethikbegutachtung in der sozial- und kulturwissenschaftlichen Forschung? Ein Debattenbeitrag aus soziologischer und ethnologischer Sicht. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2719

Wagner, G. G. (2017). Ethische Prinzipien beim Forschungsprozess und dessen Verwertung sind nur durch Selbstdisziplin der Akteure durchsetzbar – Anmerkungen aus sozial- und wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Sicht zu den vielfältigen praktischen Dimensionen einer Forschungsethik. Forschung, 3+4, 77–84.

Wassenaar, D., & Mamotte, N. (2012). Ethical issues and ethics reviews in social science research. In M. M. Leach, M. J. Stevens, G. Lindsey, A. Ferrero, & Y. Korkut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international psychological ethics (pp. 268–282). Oxford University Press.

Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). (2017). WZB Research Ethics Policy and Procedures. Forschung, 3+4, 107–112.

Yalcintas, A., & Selcuk, I. S. (2016). Research Ethics Education in Economics. Review of Social Economy, 74(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2015.1100847

Sozialwissenschaften

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende