Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Fehlverhalten

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

ALLEA, A. E. A. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/european-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity_horizon_en.pdf

Bakker, B. N., Jaidka, K., Doerr, T., Fasching, N., & Lelkes, Y. (2021). Questionable and Open Research Practices: Attitudes and Perceptions among Quantitative Communication Researchers. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab031

Baumrind, D. (1964). Psychology in action: some thoughts on the ethics of research: after reading Milgram’s Behavioral Study of Obedience. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 349–351). Ashgate.

Benbunan-Fich, R. (2016). The ethics of online research with unsuspecting users: From A/B testing to C/D experimentation. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116680664

Bos, J. (2020). Research ethics for students in the social sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6

Brislinger, E., & Moschner, M. (2019). Datenaufbereitung und Dokumentation. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (p. pp 97-114). Verlag Barbara Budrich. 10.3224/84742233.07

Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung (Ed.). (2020). Praxisleitfaden für Integrität und Ethik in der Wissenschaft. Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung. https://forschungsservice.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/d_forschungsservice/Formulare_Info_Stipendien/Praxisleitfaden_fuer_Integritaet_und_Ethik_in_der_Wissenschaft_Stand_29-9-2020_Final.pdf

Cairns, A. C., Linville, C., Garcia, T., Bridges, B., Tanoa, S., Herington, J., & Laverty, J. T. (2021). A phenomenographic study of scientists’ beliefs about the causes of scientists’ research misconduct. 17(4), 501–521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211042658

Döveling, K., Sommer, D., Podschuweit, N., Geise, S., & Roessing, T. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik im internationalen und interdisziplinären Vergleich. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung- Gerechtigkeit- Öffentlichkeit. Normative Perspektiven auf Kommunikation (Vol. 43, pp. 395–420). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349396619_Kommunikationswissenschaftliche_Forschungsethik_im_internationalen_und_interdisziplinaren_Vergleich

Dannemann, G. (2018). Crowd-Based Documentation of Plagiarism: The VroniPlag Wiki Experience. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (p. pp 45-67). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_5

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). (2019). Leitlinien zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis: Kodex (p. 31). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. https://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/rechtliche_rahmenbedingungen/gute_wissenschaftliche_praxis/kodex_gwp.pdf

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (Ed.). (2013). Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis. In Sicherung Guter Wissenschaftlicher Praxis (2. ergänzte Auflage, pp. 1–109). Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527679188.oth1

Elovici, Y., Fire, M., Herzberg, A., & Shulman, H. (2014). Ethical Considerations when Employing Fake Identities in Online Social Networks for Research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 1027–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9473-0

European Commission. Directorate General for Research. (2013). Ethics for researchers: facilitating research excellence in FP7. Publications Office. 10.27777/7491

Felaefel, M. F., Salem, M., Jaafar, R., Jassim, G., Edwards, H., Rashid-Doubell, F., Yousri, R., Ali, N. M., & Silverman, H. (2018). A Cross-Sectional Survey Study to Assess Prevalence and Attitudes Regarding Research Misconduct among Investigators in the Middle East. Journal of Academic Ethics, 16(1), 1-87. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1007/s10805-017-9295-9.

Fisher, C. B., Wertz, F. J., & Goodman, S. J. (2009). Graduate Training in Responsible Conduct of Social Science Research: The Role of Mentors and Departmental Climate. In D. Mertens & P. Ginsberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 550–564). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n35

Flynn, L., & Goldsmith, R. (2013). Case Studies for Ethics in Academic Research in the Social Sciences. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452269986

Freckelton Q. C., I. (2020). Research Misconduct. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_6-2

Freedland, K. E., & Carney, R. M. (1992). Data management and accountability in behavioral and biomedical research. American Psychologist, 47(5), 640–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.5.640

Hedges, D., & Brown, B. L. (2009). Use and Misuse of Quantitative Methods: Data Collection, Calculation, and Presentation. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 373–387). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n24

Hufen, F. (2017). Wissenschaft in Freiheit und Verantwortung: Braucht Forschung Aufpasser? Forschung & Lehre, 118–120. https://www.forschung-und-lehre.de/recht/braucht-forschung-aufpasser-153/

Israel, M. (2019). Research Ethics and Integrity for Social Scientists: Beyond Regulatory Compliance (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473910096

John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953

Johnson, J. (1991). Some Critical Attributes of Applied Communication Research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19(4), 340–346. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889109365313

Kritikos, M. (2017). Safeguarding Research Integrity in Europe: An Object of Increasing Legal Attention. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 199–210). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001016

Marcus, A., & Oransky, I. (2018). What’s Responsible for the Retraction Boom? In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (p. pp 23-28). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_2

Martinson, B. C., Crain, A. L., De Vries, R., & Anderson, M. S. (2010). The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(3), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.67

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-Research: Ethics, Security, Design, and Control in Psychological Research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161. SocINDEX with Full Text. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00254

Petillion, W., Melrose, S., Moore, S. L., & Nuttgens, S. (2017). Graduate students’ experiences with research ethics in conducting health research. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), pp 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116677635

Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1

Pimple, K. D. (Ed.). (2008). Research Ethics (1st ed.). Ashgate. https://www.routledge.com/Research-Ethics/Pimple/p/book/9780754626213

Pratt C., T., Reisig, M. D., Holtfreter, K., & Golladay, K. A. (2019). Scholars’ preferred solutions for research misconduct: results from a survey of faculty members at America’s top 100 research universities. Ethics & Behavior, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2019.1612748

Resnik, D. B. (1998). The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. Taylor & Francis Group.

Schmaling, K. B., & Blume, A. W. (2019). Ethics Instruction Increases Graduate Students’ Responsible Conduct of Research Knowledge but not Moral Reasoning. 268–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620903190323

Singer, E. (1984). Public Reactions to Some Ethical Issues of Social Research: Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 501–509. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1086/208986

Sponholz, G. (Ed.). (2019). Curriculum für Lehrveranstaltungen zur guten wissenschaftlichen Praxis - Erweiterte und überarbeitete Fassung. https://ombudsman-fuer-die-wissenschaft.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2019-Curriculum-f%C3%BCr-Lehrveranstaltungen-zur-GWP.pdf

Tagne, A. M., Cassina, N., Furgiuele, A., Storelli, E., Franca, M., & Consentino, M. (2020). Perceptions and Attitudes about Research Integrity and Misconduct: a Survey among Young Biomedical Researchers in Italy. Journal of Academic Ethics, 193–205. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-020-09359-0

Taylor, S. J. (1987). Observing abuse: professional ethics and personal morality in field research. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 371–388). Ashgate. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2FBF00988991.pdf

Torrence, B. S., Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., Turner, M. R., Todd, E. M., Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, S. (2017). Curricular Approaches in Research Ethics Education: Reflecting on More and Less Effective Practices in Instructional Content. Accountability in Research, 24(5), 269–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1276452

Vermeulen, I., & Hartmann, T. (2015). Questionable Research and Publication Practices in Communication Science. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096331

Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Research Ethics. In R. D. Wimmer & J. R. Dominick (Eds.), Mass Media Research: An Introduction. (pp. 64–87). Wadsworth Cengage.

Yeo-Teh, N. S. L., & Tang, B. L. (2021). Research ethics courses as a vaccination against a toxic research environment or culture. Research Ethics, 17(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120926686

Fehlverhalten

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende