Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Forschung am Menschen

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Afkinich, J. L., & Blachman-Demner, D. R. (2020). Providing Incentives to Youth Participants in Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619892707

Antoniou, E. E., Draper, H., Reed, K., Burls, A., Southwood, T. R., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041871

Azoury, M., Kaissi, B., & Attieh, L. (2018). Research Ethics. In J. Marx Gómez & S. Mouselli (Eds.), Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment (pp. 111–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4_7

Barnes, C. (2009). An Ethical Agenda in Disability Research: Rhetoric or Reality? In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 458–473). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n29

Barocas, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (2014). Big Data’s End Run around Anonymity and Consent. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (pp. 44–75). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107590205

Benbunan-Fich, R. (2016). The ethics of online research with unsuspecting users: From A/B testing to C/D experimentation. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116680664

Buchanan, E. A., & Ess, C. M. (2009). Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 39(3), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/1713066.1713069

Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J. D., Anderson, J., & Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Science Journal, 19, 43. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043

Cox, S. M., McDonald, M., & Townsend, A. (2020). Epistemic Strategies in Ethical Review: REB Members’ Experiences of Assessing Probable Impacts of Research for Human Subjects. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(5), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619872369

Döveling, K., Sommer, D., Podschuweit, N., Geise, S., & Roessing, T. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik im internationalen und interdisziplinären Vergleich. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung- Gerechtigkeit- Öffentlichkeit. Normative Perspektiven auf Kommunikation (Vol. 43, pp. 395–420). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349396619_Kommunikationswissenschaftliche_Forschungsethik_im_internationalen_und_interdisziplinaren_Vergleich

Dodd, S.-J. (2009). LGBTQ: Protecting Vulnerable Subjects in All Studies. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (p. 474). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n30

European Commission. Directorate General for Research. (2013). Ethics for researchers: facilitating research excellence in FP7. Publications Office. 10.27777/7491

Foe, G., & Larson, E. L. (2016). Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616637483

Frieters-Reermann, N., Klomann, V., Genenger-Stricker, M., & Sylla, N. (2021). „Wir sind nicht dein nächstes Forschungsprojekt!“ – Kritische Reflexionen zu Ethik, Methodik und Machtverhältnissen in Forschungsprozessen im Kontext von Bildung und Migration. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 255–267). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Good, A. (2020). Disability Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-19). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_30-1

Heimer, C. A., & Petty, J. (2010). Bureaucratic Ethics: IRBs and the Legal Regulation of Human Subjects Research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6(1), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131454

Heinrichs, J.-H., & Lanzerath, D. (2017). Nichtmedizinische Forschung am Menschen – Probandenschutz jenseits der Medizin. Forschung, 3+4, 90–94.

Hokke, S., Hackworth, N. J., Quin, N., Bennetts, S. K., Win, H. Y., Nicholson, J. M., Zion, L., Lucke, J., Keyzer, P., & Crawford, S. B. (2018). Ethical issues in using the internet to engage participants in family and child research: A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204572

Hopf, C. (2016). Forschungsethik und qualitative Forschung. In W. Hopf & U. Kuckartz (Eds.), Schriften zu Methodologie und Methoden qualitativer Sozialforschung (p. pp 195-205). Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11482-4_9

Iphofen, R. (2020). Acting Ethically and with Integrity for Research Subjects and Participants. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_55-1

Kaufmann, K. (2018). Mit Kriegsflüchtlingen über ihre Smartphone-Nutzung auf der Flucht sprechen: Eine forschungsethische (Selbst-)Reflexion. In M. Prinzing, M. Schröder, & N. Köberer (Eds.), Migration, Integration, Inklusion. Medienethische Potenziale für die digitale Mediengesellschaft (pp. 135–150). Nomos.

Lauber-Rönsberg, A. (2018). Data Protection Laws, Research Ethics and Social Sciences. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. 29–44). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_4

Lenk, C. (2014). Unethische Forschung und gute wissenschaftliche Praxis. In C. Lenk, G. Duttge, & H. Fangerau (Eds.), Handbuch Ethik und Recht der Forschung am Menschen (pp. 279–285). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35099-3_47

Lob-Hüdepohl, A. (2021). Begutachten – Beraten – Beteiligen. Zum normativen Anforderungsprofil einer Forschungsethikkommission. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 81–99). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Marcos Miguel, N., & Noy, S. (2023). Human Subjects Research Guidelines for Undergraduate Researchers: An Analysis of Institutional Review Board (IRB) Websites at Top Liberal Arts Colleges in the United States. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15562646231190818. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646231190818

McAreavey, R., & Das, C. (2013). A Delicate Balancing Act: Negotiating with Gatekeepers for Ethical Research When Researching Minority Communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200102

Miser, W. F. (2005). Educational research--to IRB, or not to IRB? Family Medicine, 37(3), 168–173.

Mitcham, C., & Englehardt, E. E. (2019). Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(6), 1735–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9797-7

Oakes, J. M. (2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research. An evaluator’s guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review, 26(5), 443–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/019384102236520

Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1

Pimple, K. D. (Ed.). (2008). Research Ethics (1st ed.). Ashgate. https://www.routledge.com/Research-Ethics/Pimple/p/book/9780754626213

Resnik, D. B. (1998). The Ethics of Science: An Introduction. Taylor & Francis Group.

Resnik, D. B. (2005). Eliminating the daily life risks standard from the definition of minimal risk. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.010470

Resnik, D. B. (Ed.). (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting People, Advancing Science, Promoting Trust (1st ed., Vol. 74). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8

Rollin, B. E. (Ed.). (2006). Ethics and Research on Human Beings. In Science and Ethics (pp. 66–98). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617218.005

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2013). Standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft: Einführung und forschungsethische Grundlagen. In D. Schlütz & W. Möhring (Eds.), Handbuch standardisierte Erhebungsverfahren in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (p. pp 9-19). Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18776-1_1

Sims, J. (2019). Ethical Research with Hard-to-Reach Groups. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_32-1

Singer, E. (1978). The Effect of Informed Consent Procedures on Respondents’ Reactions to Surveys. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(1), 49–57. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/208713

Stern, S. R. (2003). Encountering Distressing Information in Online Research: A Consideration of Legal and Ethical Responsibilities. New Media & Society, 5(2), 249–266. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444803005002006

Vargas, L. A., & Montoya, M. E. (2009). Involving Minors in Research: Ethics and Law Within Multicultural Settings. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 489–506). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n31

Wilkinson, A., Slack, C., Thabethe, S., & Salzwedel, J. (2022). “It’s Almost as if Stakeholder Engagement is the Annoying ‘Have-to-do’… ”: Can Ethics Review Help Address the “3 Ts” of Tokenism, Toxicity, and Tailoring in Stakeholder Engagement? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(3), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221078415

Zimmerman, S. V. (2017). The Canadian Experience: A Response to ‘Developing Standards for Research Practice: Some Issues for Consideration’ by James Parry. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 103–109). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001009

Zoller, H. M., Fujishiro, K., Mobley, A., & Lehman, E. (2015). Perspectives on Communication and Participation in Research Notification Focus Groups. Health Communication, 30(10), 986–1000. Communication & Mass Media Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=108302816&site=ehost-live

Forschung am Menschen

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende