Forschung Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.
Alexander, M., & Reed Williams, W. (2020). A Guidebook for Teaching Selected Responsible Conduct of Research Topics to a Culturally Diverse Trainee Group. Benner, A., & Löhe, J. (2021). Forschungsethische und datenschutzrechtliche Aspekte der informierten Einwilligung als Audioaufnahme. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 205–216). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16 Biernacka, K., Buchholz, P., Danker, S. A., Dolzycka, D., Engelhardt, C., Helbig, K., Jacob, J., Neumann, J., Odebrecht, C., Petersen, B., Slowig, B., Trautwein-Bruns, U., Wiljes, C., & Wuttke, U. (2021). Train-the-Trainer-Konzept zum Thema Forschungsdatenmanagement. DINI - Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerkinformation e.V., 4.0, 234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4071471 Boynton, P. M. (2017). The Research Companion: A Practical Guide for Those in the Social Sciences, Health and Development (P. M. Boynton, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaen.2005.11.007 Brennecke, P. (2020). Academic Integrity at MIT, A Handbook for Students. (A. B. Klein & E. Durant, Eds.). Calvey, D. (2019). Deception. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_15-1 Carniel, J., Hickey, A., Southey, K., Brömdal, A., Crowley-Cyr, L., Eacersall, D., Farmer, W., Gehrmann, R., Machin, T., & Pillay, Y. (2022). The ethics review and the humanities and social sciences: disciplinary distinctions in ethics review processes. Research Ethics, 174701612211472. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221147202 Craft, J. L. (2013). A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 221–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9 Curran, D., Kekewich, M., & Foreman, T. (2019). Examining the use of consent forms to promote dissemination of research results to participants. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016118798877 Dietrich, J. (2005). Ethisch-Philosophische Grundlagenkompetenzen: ein Modell für Studierende und Lehrende. In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-Philosophisches Grundlagenstudium (2. Auflage, p. pp.15-32). LIT Verlag. https://www.lit-verlag.de/isbn/978-3-8258-6780-3 Fox, J., Pearce, K. E., Massanari, A. L., Riles, J. M., Szulc, Ł., Ranjit, Y. S., Trevisan, F., Soriano, C. R. R., Vitak, J., Arora, P., Ahn, S. J. (Grace), Alper, M., Gambino, A., Gonzalez, C., Lynch, T., Williamson, L. D., & L Gonzales, A. (2021). Open Science, Closed Doors? Countering Marginalization through an Agenda for Ethical, Inclusive Research in Communication. Journal of Communication, jqab029. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab029 Franken, L. (2022). Digitale Daten und Methoden als Erweiterung qualitativer Forschungsprozesse. Herausforderungen und Potenziale aus den Digital Humanities und Computational Social Sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-22.2.3818 Freckelton Q. C., I. (2020). Research Misconduct. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_6-2 Gelinas, L., Pierce, R., Winkler, S., Cohen, I. G., Lynch, H. F., & Bierer, B. E. (2017). Using Social Media as a Research Recruitment Tool: Ethical Issues and Recommendations. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1276644 Giraud, C., Cioffo, G. D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M., & Ramirez Chaves, C. (2019). Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750081 Glasziou, P., & Chalmers, I. (2004). Ethics review roulette: what can we learn? BMJ, 328, 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7432.121 Golla, S. J., & Schönfeld, M. v. (2019). Kratzen und Schürfen im Datenmilieu – Web Scraping in sozialen Netzwerken zu wissenschaftlichen Forschungszwecken. Kommunikation und Recht, 22, 15–21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330787379_Kratzen_und_Schurfen_im_Datenmilieu_-_Web_Scraping_in_sozialen_Netzwerken_zu_wissenschaftlichen_Forschungszwecken Graf von Kielmansegg, S. (2017). Forschungslegitimation durch Einwilligung: Zwischen Autonomie und staatlicher Regulierung. Forschung, 3+4, 95–100. Graumann, S. (2011). Forschungsethik. In M. Düwell, C. Hübenthal, & M. H. Werner (Eds.), Handbuch Ethik (p. pp 252-258). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05192-9_3 Hausstein, B. (2019). Zitierbarmachung und Zitation von Forschungsdaten. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (pp. 179–192). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84742233 Heise, N., & Heesen, J. (2016). Algorithmen. In Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 202-209). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_27 Hesse-Biber, S., & Leavy, P. (2011). The Ethics of Social Research. In The Practice of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 59–86). Sage. https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/34088_Chapter4.pdf Jensen, U. (2019). Forschungsdaten und Forschungsdatenmanagement in den Sozialwissenschaften. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (p. pp 13-36). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84742233 Karr, A. F., & Reiter, J. P. (2014). Using Statistics to Protect Privacy. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 276-295). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.017 Kavouras, P., & Charitidis, C. A. (2019). Dual Use in Modern Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_7-1 Kolstoe, S. E., & Holden, L. (2019). Research Involving the Armed Forces. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_27-1 Kreuter, F., & Peng, R. D. (2014). Extracting Information from Big Data: Issues of Measurement, Inference and Linkage. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 257-275). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.016 Lauber-Rönsberg, A. (2018). Data Protection Laws, Research Ethics and Social Sciences. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. 29–44). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_4 Lell, H. M. (2018). Human Rights and the Regulation of Anonymity. New Challenges to Law and Research. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. 119–127). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_12 Müller, S. (2019). Räumliche Verknüpfung georeferenzierter Umfragedaten mit Geodaten: Chancen, Herausforderungen und praktische Empfehlungen. In U. Jensen, K. Weller, & S. Netscher (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (pp. 211–230). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84742233 Marquet, P., & Köhler, T. (2018). The Empowerment of Users: Rethinking Educational Practice Online. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (p. pp 69-89). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_6 Morgenstern-Einenkel, A., & Rädiker, S. (2021). Im Team arbeiten mit MAXQDA. MAXQDA Press. https://doi.org/10.36192/978-3-948768041 Murdock, M., & Erickson, S. (2023). Research Responsibility Agreement: a tool to support ethical research. Research Ethics, 174701612311666. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231166600 Pimple, K. D. (Ed.). (2008). Research Ethics (1st ed.). Ashgate. https://www.routledge.com/Research-Ethics/Pimple/p/book/9780754626213 Prictor, M., Lewis, M. A., Newson, A. J., Haas, M., Baba, S., Kim, H., Kokado, M., Minari, J., Molnár-Gábor, F., Yamamoto, B., Kaye, J., & Teare, H. J. A. (2019). Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619887073 Rat Für Sozial- Und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD). (2023). Handreichung Umgang mit der Kenntnisnahme von Straftaten im Rahmen der Durchführung von Forschungsvorhaben. RatSWD Output Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.74 Rieder, B., Peeters, S., & Borra, E. (2022). From tool to tool-making: Reflections on authorship in social media research software. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 135485652211270. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221127094 Schlütz, D., Zillich, A. F., & Roehse, E.-M. (2023). Ethikkommissionen in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft: Qualitätssicherung oder “Forschungsverhinderungsanstalt”? Hochschulmanagement, 18(1), 31–37. Staksrud, E., Bang, K. J., Bomann-Larsen, L., Fretheim, K., Granaas, R. C., Berg Harpviken, K., Østbø Haugen, H., Jakobsen, K. A., Johnsen, R., Kolstad, I., Hoel Lie, M., Strømmen Lile, H., Nevøy, A., Klæboe Nilsen, T., Skilbrei, M.-L., & Enebakk, V. (2019). A Guide to Internet Research Ethics. The National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (NESH). Stenmark, C. K., & Miller, R. (2021). A Little Goes a Long Way: Adapting an Ethics Training Program to Work for Smaller Universities. 16(4), 461–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211007216 Strandburg, K. (2014). Monitoring, Datafication, and Consent: Legal Approaches to Privacy in the Big Data Context. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 5-43). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107590205.003 Strobel, A., Zeiler, A., & Schaar, K. (2022). Der Stand der Dinge zur forschungsethischen Begutachtung in den Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter Forschenden. Berlin: Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD), RatSWD Working Paper 278/2022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.67 Tolich, M., Tumilty, E., Choe, L., Hohmann-Marriott, B., & Fahey, N. (2019). Researcher Emotional Safety as Ethics in Practice. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_26-1 Von Unger, H. (2018). Current Perspectives on Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 19, No 3 (2018): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-19.3.3155 Wilbanks, J. (2014). Portable Approaches to Informed Consent and Open Data. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 234-252). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.014 Wood, L., & Kahts-Kramer, S. (2023). ‘But how will you ensure the objectivity of the researcher?’ Guidelines to address possible misconceptions about the ethical imperatives of community-based research. Research Ethics, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221135882 Woodfield, K. (Ed.). (2017). The Ethics of Online Research. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/doi/10.1108/S2398-6018201802