Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Stichprobe

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Afkinich, J. L., & Blachman-Demner, D. R. (2020). Providing Incentives to Youth Participants in Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619892707

American Psychological Association (APA). (2002). Certification of Compliance With APA Ethical Principles. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073. https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/ethics.pdf

Antoniou, E. E., Draper, H., Reed, K., Burls, A., Southwood, T. R., & Zeegers, M. P. (2011). An empirical study on the preferred size of the participant information sheet in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.041871

Averbeck-Lietz, S., & Sanko, C. (2016). Wissenschafts- und Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. In S. Averbeck-Lietz & M. Meyen (Eds.), Handbuch nicht standardisierte Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 125–136). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01656-2_8

Azoury, M., Kaissi, B., & Attieh, L. (2018). Research Ethics. In J. Marx Gómez & S. Mouselli (Eds.), Modernizing the Academic Teaching and Research Environment (pp. 111–126). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4_7

Beninger, K. (2017). Social media users’ views on the ethics of social media research. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods (p. pp 57-73). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Biddle, L., Cooper, J., Owen-Smith, A., Klineberg, E., Bennewith, O., Hawton, K., Kapur, N., Donovan, J., & Gunnell, D. (2013). Qualitative interviewing with vulnerable populations: individuals’ experiences of participating in suicide and self-harm based research. Journal of Affective Disorders, 145(3), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.08.024

Boynton, P. M. (2017). The Research Companion: A Practical Guide for Those in the Social Sciences, Health and Development (P. M. Boynton, Ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaen.2005.11.007

Buchanan, E. A., & Zimmer, M. (2021, January). Internet research ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-internet-research/

Burr, V., & King, N. (2012). ‘You’re in Cruel England Now!’: Teaching Research Ethics through Reality Television. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.22

Clark, L. (2017). Ethics of Working with Vulnerable Populations. In C. S. Davis & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1–2). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0087

Cooper, J. A., & McNair, L. (2018). Practical Ethicist: What Is “Understandable” Language? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 368–370.

Cooper, J. A., McNair, L., & McNair, L. (2019). Reviewing Student Research: Can We Consider Bad Science to Be Ethical? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(1), 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618816539

Curran, D., Kekewich, M., & Foreman, T. (2019). Examining the use of consent forms to promote dissemination of research results to participants. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016118798877

Döveling, K., Sommer, D., Podschuweit, N., Geise, S., & Roessing, T. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik im internationalen und interdisziplinären Vergleich. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung- Gerechtigkeit- Öffentlichkeit. Normative Perspektiven auf Kommunikation (Vol. 43, pp. 395–420). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349396619_Kommunikationswissenschaftliche_Forschungsethik_im_internationalen_und_interdisziplinaren_Vergleich

Dzeyk, W. (2001). Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung. Kölner Psychologische Studien, 6(1), 1–29. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/2424/1/ethdimon.pdf

Eble, M., Ziegele, M., & Jürgens, P. (2014). Forschung in geschlossenen Plattformen des Social Web. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung: Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 123–149). Herbert von Halem.

European Commission. Directorate General for Research. (2013). Ethics for researchers: facilitating research excellence in FP7. Publications Office. 10.27777/7491

European Commission. Directorate-General for Research. (2011). European textbook on ethics in research. Publications Office. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/12567a07-6beb-4998-95cd-8bca103fcf43/language-en

Foe, G., & Larson, E. L. (2016). Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616637483

Forsyth, D. R., & Pope, W. R. (1984). Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research: Multidimensional Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1365

Fraas, C., Meier, S., & Pentzold, C. (Eds.). (2012). Forschungsethik. In Online-Kommunikation (pp. 188–195). Oldenbourg Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486714814

Friedrichs, J. (2019). Forschungsethik. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (pp. 67–76). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_4

Gelling, L., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2011). Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees. Research Ethics, 7(3), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700305

Hargittai, E. (2020). Potential Biases in Big Data: Omitted Voices on Social Media. Social Science Computer Review, 38(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318788322

Harris, J., & Porcellato, L. (2018). Opt-Out Parental Consent in Online Surveys: Ethical Considerations. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(3), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618766953

Helfferich, C. (Ed.). (2011). Forschungsethik, Datenschutzbestimmungen und Einwilligungserklärung. In Die Qualität qualitativer Daten Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews (pp. 190–192). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92076-4_6

Jennings, S. (2012). Response to Schrag: What are ethics committees for anyway? A defence of social science research ethics review. Research Ethics, 8(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016112445423

Keith, P. K., & Fairfield, J. A. T. (2017). Ethics of Empirical Research. In J. Matthes, R. F. Potter, & C. S. Davis (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (p. pp 1-17). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0086

Leavy, P. (2017). Ethics in Social Research. In P. Leavy (Ed.), Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches (pp. 34–55). The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12276

Liang, H., & Zhu, J. J. H. (2017). Big Data, Collection of (Social Media, Harvesting). In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1–18). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0015

Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2017). Research Ethics in Context: Decision-Making in Digital Research. In M. T. Schäfer & K. Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society: Studying Culture through Data (pp. 201–209). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011-017

Oliver, P. (2010). The Student’s Guide To Research Ethics (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

Pentzold, C. (2015). Forschungsethische Prämissen und Problemfelder teilnehmenden Beobachtens auf Online-Plattformen. In A. Maireder, J. Ausserhofer, C. Schumann, & M. Taddicken (Eds.), Digitale Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 61–85). https://doi.org/10.17174/dcr.v2.0

Pflüger, A., & Dobel, H. (2014). Datenschutz in der Online-Forschung. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung: Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 485–518). Herbert von Halem Verlag.

Pickles, J. (2017). Contamination of overt data with covert data. Research Ethics, 14(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117721281

Recuber, T. (2015). From obedience to contagion: Discourses of power in Milgram, Zimbardo, and the Facebook experiment. Research Ethics, 12(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115579533

Rollin, B. E. (Ed.). (2006). Ethics and Research on Human Beings. In Science and Ethics (pp. 66–98). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617218.005

Sawyer, J. S., Wilner, L. L., & Brewster, M. E. (2017). Ethics in Gender Research. In K. L. Nadal (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Psychology and Gender (pp. 506–508). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384269.n170

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2018). Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Negotiating ethics and method in communication research practice. Studies in Communication | Media, 7(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2018-1-31

Stern, S. R. (2003). Encountering Distressing Information in Online Research: A Consideration of Legal and Ethical Responsibilities. New Media & Society, 5(2), 249–266. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444803005002006

Theiss, J. D., Hobbs, W. B., Giordano, P. J., & Brunson, O. M. (2014). Undergraduate Consent Form Reading in Relation to Conscientiousness, Procrastination, and the Point-of-Time Effect. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540593

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technologyand Technology Directorate, Cyber Security Division Directorate, Bailey, M., Burstein, A., Claffy, K., Clayman, S., Dittrich, D., Heidemann, J., Kenneally, E., Maughan, D., McNeill, J., Neumann, P., Scheper, C., Tien, L., Papadopoulos, C., Visscher, W., & Westby, J. (2012). The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/st-menlo-report

Van Schie, G., Westra, I., & Schäfer, M. T. (2017). Get Your Hands Dirty: Emerging Data Practices as Challenge for Research Integrity. In M. T. Schäfer & K. Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society Studying Culture through Data (pp. 183–200). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011-016

Venema, R., Pfurtscheller, D., & Lobinger, K. (2020). Doing Visual Analysis Online. Forschungsethische Herausforderungen und Handlungsempfehlungen zur Analyse vernetzter Bilder. In C. Brantner, G. Götzenbrucker, K. Lobinger, & M. Schreiber (Eds.), Vernetzte Bilder: Visuelle Kommunikation in Sozialen Medien (pp. 288–310). von Halem.

Von Unger, H. (2018). Forschungsethik, digitale Archivierung und biographische Interviews. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung (pp. 681–693). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18171-0_57

Wassie, L., Gebre-Mariam, S., Tarekegne, G., & Rennie, S. (2019). Enhancing ethics review of social and behavioral research: developing a review template in Ethiopia. Research Ethics, 15(3–4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119865731

Zeni, J. (1998). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799800200053

Stichprobe

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende