Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Digitalisierung

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Bischof, S., Lengerer, F., & Meyer, F. (2022). Interaktionsspuren im digitalen Raum: Zum Spannungsfeld von Öffentlichkeit und Anonymität in qualitativen Forschungsprozessen. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 23 No. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-23.3.3893

Burbules, N. C. (2009). Privacy and New Technologies: The Limits of Traditional Research Ethics. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 537–549). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n34

Buyx, A. (2017). Forschungsethische Implikationen von Big Data im Gesundheitsbereich: die Stellungnahme des Deutschen Ethikrats von November 2017. Forschung, 3+4, 77–84.

Cato, K. D., Bockting, W., & Larson, E. (2016). Did I Tell You That? Ethical Issues Related to Using Computational Methods to Discover Non-Disclosed Patient Characteristics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616661611

Condie, J., Lean, G., & Wilcockson, B. (2017). The Trouble with Tinder: The Ethical Complexities of Researching Location-Aware Social Discovery Apps. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 135–158). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002006

Diebel-Fischer, H. (2018). Research Ethics in the Digital Age: Fundamentals and Problems. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. pp7-21). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_2

Dwork, C. (2014). Differential Privacy: A Cryptographic Approach to Private Data Analysis. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 296-322). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.018

Elias, P. (2014). A European Perspective on Research and Big Data Analysis. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 173-191). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.011

Ess, C. (2020). Digital Media Ethics. Wiley & Sons.

Eynon, R., Schroeder, R., & Fry, J. (2009). New Techniques in Online Research: Challenges for Research Ethics. Twenty-First Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 4(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450140903000308

Faied, H. A. (2018). Perception of Digital Methods’ Ethics among Egyptian Researchers. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. 89–94). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_7

Fecke, M., Fehr, A., Schlütz, D., & Zillich, A. F. (2022). The Ethics of Gatekeeping: How Guarding Access Influences Digital Child and Youth Research. Media and Communication, 10(1), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4756

Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 205630511876336. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366

Filipović, A. (2015). Die Datafizierung der Welt. Eine ethische Vermessung des digitalen Wandels. Communicatio Socialis, 48(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.5771/0010-3497-2015-1-6

Franken, L. (2022). Digitale Daten und Methoden als Erweiterung qualitativer Forschungsprozesse. Herausforderungen und Potenziale aus den Digital Humanities und Computational Social Sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-22.2.3818

Freelon, D. (2018). Computational Research in the Post-API Age. Political Communication, 35(4), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1477506

Godulla, A. (2019). Ethische Aspekte der Visuellen Kommunikationsforschung. In K. Lobinger (Ed.), Handbuch Visuelle Kommunikationsforschung (pp. 703–721). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06508-9_33

Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G., & Booth, A. (2017). Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), 195. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082

Grimm, P., & Krah, H. (2016). Privatsphäre. In J. Heesen (Ed.), Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 178-185). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_24

Hagen, S., Bishop, E. L., Koščík, M., Vavra, M., Štebe, J., Ryan, L., Payne, E., Løvlie, A. G., Rød, L.-M., Straume, Ø., & Myhren, M. H. (2019). Report on legal and ethical framework and strategies related to access, use, re-use, dissemination and preservation of social media data (6.3; p. 47). SERISS project funded under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research. https://seriss.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/D6.3-Report-on-legal-and-ethical-framework-and-strategies...__FINAL.pdf

Harris, J., & Porcellato, L. (2018). Opt-Out Parental Consent in Online Surveys: Ethical Considerations. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(3), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618766953

Heise, N. (2011). „Alles neu macht das Netz?“ – Ethik der Internetforschung Eine qualitativ-heuristische Befragungsstudie. In T. Köhler (Ed.), Wissensgemeinschaften : Digitale Medien – Öffnung und Offenheit in Forschung und Lehre. (p. pp.339-341). Waxmann Verlag. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-76473

Heise, N. (2017). Warum das Rad neu erfinden? Gedanken zur Diskussion um Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft in Anknüpfung an den Beitrag von Daniela Schlütz und Wiebke Möhring in M&K 4/2016. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-766

Heise, N., & Heesen, J. (2016). Algorithmen. In Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 202-209). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_27

Hine, C. (2021). Evaluating the prospects for university-based ethical governance in artificial intelligence and data-driven innovation. 17(4), 464–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211022790

Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P. (2021). Data sovereignty: A review Big Data & Society. SAGE Publication, 8(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720982012

Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P. (2021). Data sovereignty: A review. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 2053951720982012. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720982012

Johns, M. D., Chen, S.-L., & Hall, G. J. (Eds.). (2004). Online social research: methods, issues & ethics. P. Lang.

Johns, M. D., Hall, G. J., & Chen, S.-L. (2004). Research Paparazzi in Cyberspace: The Voices of the Researched. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 157–178). P. Lang.

Johns, M. D., Hall, G. J., & Crowell, T. L. (2004). Surviving the IRB Review: Institutional Guidelines and Research Strategies. In M. D. Johns, S.-L. Chen, & G. J. Hall (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (p. pp.105-124). P. Lang.

Köhler, D. (2005). Problemfelder der Internet-Ethik. In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-philosophisches Grundlagenstudium. 2: Ein Projektbuch (pp. 219–228). LIT Verlag.

Kaye, J., Whitley, E. A., Lund, D., Morrison, M., Teare, H., & Melham, K. (2015). Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. European Journal of Human Genetics, 23(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2014.71

Kunzelmann, Daniel. (2019). Zwischen den Menschen – das Medium: eine Ethnographie über die Digitalisierung zivilgesellschaftlicher Protestformen im Spanien der (Nach-)Krisenjahre. Murcia, 2013-2015 [Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München]. https://doi.org/10.5282/EDOC.28236

Landwehr, C. (2014). Engineered Controls for Dealing with Big Data. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 211-233). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.013

Lindegren, D., Karegar, F., Kane, B., & Pettersson, J. S. (2021). An evaluation of three designs to engage users when providing their consent on smartphones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(4), 398–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1697898

Lobinger, K., Reißmann, W., Pfurtscheller, D., Brantner, C., Venema, R., & Marchiori, E. (2019). Theoretische, thematische, forschungsethische und methodologische Herausforderungen der Visuellen Kommunikationsforschung. In K. Lobinger (Ed.), Handbuch Visuelle Kommunikationsforschung (pp. 1–28). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06738-0_37-1

Möhring, W., & Schlütz, D. (2022). CCS fordert der Community forschungsethische Reflexion ab. Aviso, 75(2), 9–10.

Mahrt, M., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The Value of Big Data in Digital Media Research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.761700

Mancosu, M., & Vegetti, F. (2020). What You Can Scrape and What Is Right to Scrape: A Proposal for a Tool to Collect Public Facebook Data. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 205630512094070. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120940703

Marquet, P., & Köhler, T. (2018). The Empowerment of Users: Rethinking Educational Practice Online. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (p. pp 69-89). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_6

Matzner, T. (2016). Anonymität. In J. Heesen (Ed.), Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 248-254). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_33

Mauer, R., & Recker, J. (2019). Data Sharing: Von der Sicherung zur langfristigen Nutzung der Forschungsdaten. In K. Weller, S. Netscher, & U. Jensen (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (pp. 115–134). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84742233

Medley-Rath, S. (2019). Using Facebook Secret Groups for Qualitative Data Collection. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3963

Neuhaus, F., & Webmoor, T. (2012). Agile ethics for massified research and visualization. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.616519

Nissenbaum, H. (2011). A Contextual Approach to Privacy Online. Daedalus, 140(4), 32–48. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2567042

Nissenbaum, H. F. (2010). Introduction. In Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life (pp. 1–17). Stanford Law Books.

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-Research: Ethics, Security, Design, and Control in Psychological Research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161. SocINDEX with Full Text. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00254

Östman, S., & Turtiainen, R. (2016). From Research Ethics to Researching Ethics in an Online Specific Context. Media and Communication, 4(4), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.571

Prinzing, M., Debatin, B., & Köberer, N. (2020). Kommunikations- und Medienethik reloaded? Wegmarken für eine Orientierungssuche im Digitalen (N. Köberer, A. Filipović, C. Schicha, I. Stapf, & B. Debatin, Eds.; 1st ed., Vol. 11). © Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. 10.5771/9783748905158

Quinton, S., & Reynolds, N. (2017). The Changing Roles of Researchers and Participants in Digital and Social Media Research: Ethics Challenges and Forward Directions. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 53–78). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002003

Richter, P. (2016). Big Data. In J. Heesen (Ed.), Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 210-216). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_28

Rieder, B., Peeters, S., & Borra, E. (2022). From tool to tool-making: Reflections on authorship in social media research software. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 135485652211270. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221127094

Roehse, E.-M., Zillich, A. F., Schlütz, D., Möhring, W., & Link, E. (2023). Eine Projektwebseite als Ort der Wissenschaftskommunikation – Potenziale und Grenzen. In C. Paganini, M. Prinzing, & J. Serong (Eds.), Wissen kommunizieren. Ethische Anforderungen an die Kommunikation zwischen Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft (1. Auflage, Vol. 20, pp. 177–190). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748934066

Salganik, M. J. (2017). Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age (Open review edition). Princeton University Press. https://www.bitbybitbook.com/en/introduction/ink-blot/

Staksrud, E., Bang, K. J., Bomann-Larsen, L., Fretheim, K., Granaas, R. C., Berg Harpviken, K., Østbø Haugen, H., Jakobsen, K. A., Johnsen, R., Kolstad, I., Hoel Lie, M., Strømmen Lile, H., Nevøy, A., Klæboe Nilsen, T., Skilbrei, M.-L., & Enebakk, V. (2019). A Guide to Internet Research Ethics. The National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (NESH).

Stern, S. R. (2003). Encountering Distressing Information in Online Research: A Consideration of Legal and Ethical Responsibilities. New Media & Society, 5(2), 249–266. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444803005002006

Sugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2017). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116650720

Taylor, J., & Pagliari, C. (2018). Mining social media data: How are research sponsors and researchers addressing the ethical challenges? Research Ethics, 14(2), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117738559

Thomas, J. (2004). Reexamining the Ethics of Internet Research: Facing the Challenge of Overzealous Oversight. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 187–202). P. Lang.

Tiidenberg, K. (2018). Research Ethics, Vulnerability, and Trust on the Internet. In J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, & M. M. Allen (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Internet Research (pp. 1–15). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_55-1

Trepte, S. (2021). The Social Media Privacy Model: Privacy and Communication in the Light of Social Media Affordances. Communication Theory, 31(4), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz035

Vallor, S. (2021). Social Networking and Ethics. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/ethics-social-networking/

Warfield, K., Hoholuk, J., Vincent, B., & Camargo, A. D. (2019). Pics, Dicks, Tits, and Tats: negotiating ethics working with images of bodies in social media research. New Media & Society, 21(9), 2068–2086. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819837715

Weller, K. (2019). Big Data & New Data: Ein Ausblick auf die Herausforderungen im Umgang mit Social-Media-Inhalten als neue Art von Forschungsdaten. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (p. pp 193-210). Verlag Barbara Budrich. 10.3224/84742233.12

Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., Sloan, L., Jessop, C., & Lepps, H. (2017). Users’ ViewS of Ethics in Social Media Research: Informed Consent, Anonymity, and Harm. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 27–52). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002002

Willis, R. (2019). Observations online: Finding the ethical boundaries of Facebook research. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117740176

Woodfield, K. (Ed.). (2017). The Ethics of Online Research. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/doi/10.1108/S2398-6018201802

Woodfield, K., & Iphofen, R. (2017). Introduction to Volume 2: The Ethics of Online Research. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 1–12). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002013

Digitalisierung

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende