Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Mesoebene

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

American Psychological Association (APA). (2002). Certification of Compliance With APA Ethical Principles. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073. https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/ethics.pdf

Averbeck-Lietz, S., & Sanko, C. (2016). Wissenschafts- und Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. In S. Averbeck-Lietz & M. Meyen (Eds.), Handbuch nicht standardisierte Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 125–136). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01656-2_8

Brabin, L., Roberts, S., Tully, M., Vail, A., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 1.: Scientific Reviews: What Should Ethics Committees Be Looking For? Research Ethics, 5(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500109

Buchanan, E. A., & Zimmer, M. (2021, January). Internet research ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-internet-research/

Burr, J., & Reynolds, P. (2010). The Wrong Paradigm? Social Research and the Predicates of Ethical Scrutiny. Research Ethics, 6(4), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600404

Colnerud, G. (2013). Brief report: ethical problems in research practice. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(4), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.37

Curran, D., Kekewich, M., & Foreman, T. (2019). Examining the use of consent forms to promote dissemination of research results to participants. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016118798877

Dingwall, R., Iphofen, R., Lewis, J., Oates, J., & Emmerich, N. (2017). Towards Common Principles for Social Science Research Ethics: A Discussion Document for the Academy of Social Sciences. In R. I. FAcSS (Ed.), Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity (Vol. 1, pp. 111–123). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001010

Dzeyk, W. (2001). Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung. Kölner Psychologische Studien, 6(1), 1–29. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/2424/1/ethdimon.pdf

Endres, S., & Filipovic, A. (2018). „Prinzipien für Befragungen zu moralisch polarisierenden Fragestellungen“ Für das Projekt „MeKriF - Flucht als Krise. Mediale Krisendarstellung, Medienumgang und Bewältigung durch Heranwachsende am Beispiel Flucht“. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327437473_Prinzipien_fur_Befragungen_zu_moralisch_polarisierenden_Fragestellungen

Flick, C. (2016). Informed consent and the Facebook emotional manipulation study. Research Ethics, 12(1), pp 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115599568

Foe, G., & Larson, E. L. (2016). Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616637483

Fraas, C., Meier, S., & Pentzold, C. (Eds.). (2012). Forschungsethik. In Online-Kommunikation (pp. 188–195). Oldenbourg Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486714814

Friedrichs, J. (2019). Forschungsethik. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (pp. 67–76). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_4

Fuchs, M., Heinemann, T., Heinrichs, B., Hübner, D., Kipper, J., Rottländer, K., Runkel, T., Spranger, T. M., Vermeulen, V., & Völker-Albert, M. (2010). Forschungsethik: eine Einführung. Verlag J. B. Metzler. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783476022493#aboutAuthors

Gelling, L., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2011). Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees. Research Ethics, 7(3), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700305

Golla, S., & Bäcker, M. (2020). Handreichung Datenschutz (2. vollst. überarb. Aufl.) (p. 40). RatSWD. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.50

Hartmann, D. J., & McLaughlin, O. (2018). Heuristic Patterns of Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(5), 561–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618800208

Heesen, J. (Ed.). (2016). Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (1st ed.). J. B. Metzler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7

Heise, N. (2017). Warum das Rad neu erfinden? Gedanken zur Diskussion um Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft in Anknüpfung an den Beitrag von Daniela Schlütz und Wiebke Möhring in M&K 4/2016. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-766

Heise, N., & Schmidt, J.-H. (2014). Ethik der Online-Forschung. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung. Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 519–539). von Halem.

Helfferich, C. (Ed.). (2011). Forschungsethik, Datenschutzbestimmungen und Einwilligungserklärung. In Die Qualität qualitativer Daten Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews (pp. 190–192). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92076-4_6

Iphofen, R. (2019). An Introduction to Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_62-1

Iphofen, R. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (1–2). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7

Keith, P. K., & Fairfield, J. A. T. (2017). Ethics of Empirical Research. In J. Matthes, R. F. Potter, & C. S. Davis (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (p. pp 1-17). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0086

Kvalnes, Ø. (Ed.). (2020). Digital Dilemmas: Exploring Social Media Ethics in Organizations (1. Edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45927-7

Maring, M. (2011). Forschungs- und Wissenschaftsethik. In R. Stoecker, C. Neuhäuser, M.-L. Raters, & F. Koberling (Eds.), Handbuch Angewandte Ethik (pp. 165–170). J. B. Metzler. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-476-05320-6_4

Metcalf, J., & Crawford, K. (2016). Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716650211

Mitcham, C., & Englehardt, E. E. (2019). Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader (and Deeper) Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(6), 1735–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9797-7

Mooney-Somers, J., & Olsen, A. (2017). Ethical review and qualitative research competence: Guidance for reviewers and applicants. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116677636

Morris, M. C., & Morris, J. Z. (2016). The importance of virtue ethics in the IRB. Research Ethics, 12(4), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116656023

Msoroka, M. S., & Amundsen, D. (2018). One size fits not quite all: Universal research ethics with diversity. Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739939

OECD. (2016). Research Ethics and New Forms of Data for Social and Economic Research (23074957; OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 34, p. 57). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jln7vnpxs32-en

Oellers, C., & Wegner, E. (2009). Does Germany Need a (New) Research Ethics for the Social Sciences? (86; RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 86). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://www.ratswd.de/download/RatSWD_WP_2009/RatSWD_WP_86.pdf

Pentzold, C. (2015). Forschungsethische Prämissen und Problemfelder teilnehmenden Beobachtens auf Online-Plattformen. In A. Maireder, J. Ausserhofer, C. Schumann, & M. Taddicken (Eds.), Digitale Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 61–85). https://doi.org/10.17174/dcr.v2.0

Perrault, E. K., & McCullock, S. P. (2019). Concise Consent Forms Appreciated—Still Not Comprehended: Applying Revised Common Rule Guidelines in Online Studies. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619853453

Perrault, E. K., & Nazione, S. A. (2016). Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616654610

Pope, K. S., & Vetter, V. A. (1992). Ethical dilemmas encountered by members of the American Psychological Association: A national survey. American Psychologist, 47(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.3.397

Prictor, M., Lewis, M. A., Newson, A. J., Haas, M., Baba, S., Kim, H., Kokado, M., Minari, J., Molnár-Gábor, F., Yamamoto, B., Kaye, J., & Teare, H. J. A. (2019). Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619887073

Rakebrand, T. (2020). Wissenschafts- und Forschungsethik als Schlüsselkompetenz Studierender. Herausforderungen und Potenziale für den systematischen Einbezug als Ausbildungsinhalt. HDS-Journal, 12–18. https://ul.qucosa.de/api/qucosa%3A72556/attachment/ATT-0/

Rakebrand, T., & Schlütz, D. (2019). Forschungsethik in der kommunikations- und medienwissenschaftlichen Hochschullehre. Erkenntnisse aus der Praxis. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 67(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2019-2-187

Raykov, M. (2020). Education researchers’ perceptions of and experiences with the research ethics application process in Europe and beyond. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119893461

Reid, A. M., Brown, J. M., Smith, J. M., Cope, A. C., & Jamieson, S. (2018). Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspect Med Educ, 7(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2

Roberts, S., Brabin, L., Vail, A., Tully, M., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 4. Research Conduct. Research Ethics, 5(4), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500404

Robertson, M. (2014). The case for ethics review in the social sciences: Drawing from practice at Queen Mary University of London. Research Ethics, 10(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016113511177

Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2011). Ethical Principles in Data Analysis: An Overview. In A. T. Panter & S. K. Sterba (Eds.), Handbook of Ethics in Quantitative Methodology (pp. 37–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840023.ch3

Roth, W.-M. (2018). A Transactional Approach to Research Ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3061

Samuel, G., & Buchanan, E. (2020). Guest Editorial: Ethical Issues in Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619901215

Sawyer, J. S., Wilner, L. L., & Brewster, M. E. (2017). Ethics in Gender Research. In K. L. Nadal (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Psychology and Gender (pp. 506–508). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384269.n170

Schmidt, J.-H. (2009). Braucht das Web 2.0 eine eigene Forschungsethik? Zeitschrift für Kommunikationsökologie und Medienethik, 11 (2), 40–44. https://www.hans-bredow-institut.de/en/publications/does-the-web-2-0-need-its-own-research-ethics

Sellers, C., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. (2019). Reasoning “Uncharted Territory”: Notions of Expertise Within Ethics Review Panels Assessing Research Use of Social Media. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619837088

Silverman, H., Strosberg, M., Luna, F., Philpott, S., & Hemmerle, C. A. (2013). An analysis of online courses in research ethics in the Fogarty-sponsored bioethics training programs. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics, 8(5), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.59

Spellecy, R., Eve, A. M., Connors, E. R., Shaker, R., & Clark, D. C. (2018). The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618780803

Taylor, J., & Pagliari, C. (2018). Mining social media data: How are research sponsors and researchers addressing the ethical challenges? Research Ethics, 14(2), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117738559

Tully, M., Vail, A., Roberts, S., Brabin, L., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 3.: Sampling and Data Analysis. Research Ethics, 5(3), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500313

Vail, A., Tully, M., Brabin, L., Roberts, S., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 2.: Are the Study Aims Justified and is the Design Appropriate? Research Ethics, 5(2), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500212

Van Baalen, S. (2018). ‘Google wants to know your location’: The ethical challenges of fieldwork in the digital age. Research Ethics, 14(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750312

Von Unger, H. (2018). Forschungsethik, digitale Archivierung und biographische Interviews. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung (pp. 681–693). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18171-0_57

Von Unger, H., Dilger, H., & Schönhuth, M. (2016). Ethikbegutachtung in der sozial- und kulturwissenschaftlichen Forschung? Ein Debattenbeitrag aus soziologischer und ethnologischer Sicht. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2719

Von Unger, H., Narimani, P., & M´Bayo, R. (Eds.). (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Reflexivität, Perspektiven, Positionen (1st ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9

Wassie, L., Gebre-Mariam, S., Tarekegne, G., & Rennie, S. (2019). Enhancing ethics review of social and behavioral research: developing a review template in Ethiopia. Research Ethics, 15(3–4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119865731

Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2018). Framing “Deception” and “Covertness” in Research: Do Milgram, Humphreys, and Zimbardo Justify Regulating Social Science Research Ethics? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3), Art. 15. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3102

Zeni, J. (1998). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799800200053

Zeni, J. (2009). Ethics and the ‘Personal’ in Action Research. In B. Somekh & S. E. Noffke (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 254–265). Sage.

Mesoebene

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende