Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Ethikkommissionen

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Altmeppen, K.-D. (2016). Ethik ist kein Springteufel. Warum Ethik und Kritik in der Wissenschaft keine Gegensätze sind. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(1), 114–116. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2016-1-114

Barnes, S. B. (2004). Issues of Attribution and Identification in Online Social Research. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 203–222). P. Lang.

Borrett, D. S., Sampson, H., & Cavoukian, A. (2017). Research ethics by design: A collaborative research design proposal. Research Ethics, 13(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116673135

Bosk, C. L., & De Vries, R. G. (2004). Bureaucracies of Mass Deception: Institutional Review Boards and the Ethics of Ethnographic Research. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595(1), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204266913

Boyd, D. (2016). Untangling research and practice: What Facebook’s “emotional contagion” study teaches us. Research Ethics, 12(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115583379

Boyd, K. M. (2017). Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 55–60). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001006

Brabin, L., Roberts, S., Tully, M., Vail, A., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 1.: Scientific Reviews: What Should Ethics Committees Be Looking For? Research Ethics, 5(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500109

Brey, P., Shelley-Egan, C., Rodrigues, R., & Jansen, P. (2017). The Ethical Assessment of Research and Innovation – A Reflection on the State of the Art (Based on Findings of the SATORI Project). In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 185–198). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001015

Buchanan, E. A., & Ess, C. M. (2009). Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 39(3), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/1713066.1713069

Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung (Ed.). (2020). Praxisleitfaden für Integrität und Ethik in der Wissenschaft. Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung. https://forschungsservice.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/d_forschungsservice/Formulare_Info_Stipendien/Praxisleitfaden_fuer_Integritaet_und_Ethik_in_der_Wissenschaft_Stand_29-9-2020_Final.pdf

Burr, J., & Reynolds, P. (2010). The Wrong Paradigm? Social Research and the Predicates of Ethical Scrutiny. Research Ethics, 6(4), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600404

Cairns, A. C., Linville, C., Garcia, T., Bridges, B., Tanoa, S., Herington, J., & Laverty, J. T. (2021). A phenomenographic study of scientists’ beliefs about the causes of scientists’ research misconduct. 17(4), 501–521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211042658

Carniel, J., Hickey, A., Southey, K., Brömdal, A., Crowley-Cyr, L., Eacersall, D., Farmer, W., Gehrmann, R., Machin, T., & Pillay, Y. (2022). The ethics review and the humanities and social sciences: disciplinary distinctions in ethics review processes. Research Ethics, 174701612211472. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221147202

Carpentier, R., & McGillivray, B. (2019). Protecting Participants in Clinical Trials Through Research Ethics Review. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_3-1

Carter, C. J., Koene, A., Perez, E., Statache, R., Adolphs, S., O’Malley, C., Rodden, T., & McAuley, D. (2016). Understanding academic attitudes towards the ethical challenges posed by social media research. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 45(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874268

Charlesworth, A. (2012). Data Protection, Freedom of Information and Ethical Review Committees. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 85–103. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.637572

Coomber, R. (2002). Signing your life away?: Why Research Ethics Committees (REC) shouldn’t always require written confirmation that participants in research have been informed of the aims of a study and their rights - the case of criminal populations. (Commentary). Sociological Research Online, 7(1), 218–221. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.678

Cooper, J. A., McNair, L., & McNair, L. (2019). Reviewing Student Research: Can We Consider Bad Science to Be Ethical? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(1), 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618816539

Cox, S. M., McDonald, M., & Townsend, A. (2020). Epistemic Strategies in Ethical Review: REB Members’ Experiences of Assessing Probable Impacts of Research for Human Subjects. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(5), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619872369

Crawford, S., Hokke, S., Nicholson, J. M., Zion, L., Lucke, J., Keyzer, P., & Hackworth, N. (2019). “It’s not black and white”: Public health researchers’ and ethics committees’ perceptions of engaging research participants online. Internet Research, 29(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-07-2017-0278

Cutcliffe, J. R., & Ramcharan, P. (2002). Leveling the Playing Field? Exploring the Merits of the Ethics-as-Process Approach for Judging Qualitative Research Proposals. Qualitative Health Research, 12(7), 1000–1010.

Döveling, K., Sommer, D., Podschuweit, N., Geise, S., & Roessing, T. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik im internationalen und interdisziplinären Vergleich. In P. Werner, L. Rinsdorf, T. Pleil, & K.-D. Altmeppen (Eds.), Verantwortung- Gerechtigkeit- Öffentlichkeit. Normative Perspektiven auf Kommunikation (Vol. 43, pp. 395–420). UVK Verlagsgesellschaft Konstanz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349396619_Kommunikationswissenschaftliche_Forschungsethik_im_internationalen_und_interdisziplinaren_Vergleich

Dove, E. S., & Garattini, C. (2018). Expert perspectives on ethics review of international data-intensive research: Working towards mutual recognition. Research Ethics, 14(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117711972

Elgesem, D. (2016). Consent and information – ethical considerations when conducting research on social media. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 14–34). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3

Emmerich, N. (2017). Remaking Research Ethics in the Social Sciences: Anthropological Reflections on a Collaborative Process. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 125–148). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001011

Ess, C. (2016). New selves, new research ethics? In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 48–76). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3

Ess, C. M. (2019). Internet Research Ethics and Social Media. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_12-1

Favaretto, M., De Clercq, E., Briel, M., & Elger, B. S. (2020). Working Through Ethics Review of Big Data Research Projects: An Investigation into the Experiences of Swiss and American Researchers. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264620935223

Ferretti, A., Ienca, M., Rivas Velarde, M., Hurst, S., & Vayena, E. (2021). The Challenges of Big Data for Research Ethics Committees: A Qualitative Swiss Study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethic, 1–15, 15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211053538

Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., & Feldman, L. G. (2009). Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students. Ethics & Behavior, 19(6), 496–518. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1080/10508420903275283

Flicker, S., Travers, R., Guta, A., McDonald, S., & Meagher, A. (2007). Ethical Dilemmas in Community-Based Participatory Research: Recommendations for Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84, 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-007-9165-7

Gelling, L., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2011). Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees. Research Ethics, 7(3), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700305

Giraud, C., Cioffo, G. D., Kervyn de Lettenhove, M., & Ramirez Chaves, C. (2019). Navigating research ethics in the absence of an ethics review board: The importance of space for sharing. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750081

Glasziou, P., & Chalmers, I. (2004). Ethics review roulette: what can we learn? BMJ, 328, 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7432.121

Goerge, L. (2020). The Ethics of Research and Indigenous Peoples. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_31-1

Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360

Hammersley, M. (2009). Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802170288

Hammersley, M. (2017). Communitarian Principles That Will Increase the Damage Done by Ethical Regulation? A Response to ‘The Quest for Generic Ethics Principles in Social Science Research’ by David Carpenter. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 19–27). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001002

Heimer, C. A., & Petty, J. (2010). Bureaucratic Ethics: IRBs and the Legal Regulation of Human Subjects Research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6(1), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131454

Hennell, K., Limmer, M., & Piacentini, M. (2020). Ethical Dilemmas Using Social Media in Qualitative Social Research: A Case Study of Online Participant Observation. Sociological Research Online, 25(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780419888933

Hibbin, R. A., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. E. (2018). From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617751510

Hine, C. (2021). Evaluating the prospects for university-based ethical governance in artificial intelligence and data-driven innovation. 17(4), 464–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211022790

Hokke, S., Hackworth, N. J., Bennetts, S. K., Nicholson, J. M., Keyzer, P., Lucke, J., Zion, L., & Crawford, S. B. (2020). Ethical Considerations in Using Social Media to Engage Research Participants: Perspectives of Australian Researchers and Ethics Committee Members. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619854629

Hunter, R. (2017). Research as a Social Practice: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 47–54). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001005

Iphofen, R. (2017). Achieving Consensus in Research Ethics: An Interim Conclusion and Some Recommendations. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 211–225). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001017

Iphofen, R. (2017). The ‘Ethics Rupture’ and the New Brunswick Declaration. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 151–155). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001012

Iphofen, R. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (Vol. 1–2). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7

Israel, M. (2019). Organizing and Contesting Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_63-1

Jackson, J. L., & Larson, E. (2016). Prevalence and commonalities of informed consent templates for biomedical research. Research Ethics, 12(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116649995

Jennings, S. (2012). Response to Schrag: What are ethics committees for anyway? A defence of social science research ethics review. Research Ethics, 8(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016112445423

Kämper, E. (2016). Risiken sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschung? Forschungsethik, Datenschutz und Schutz von Persönlichkeitsrechten in den Sozial- und Verhaltenswissenschaften. RatSWD Working Paper Series, 255. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.21

Kaewkungwal, J., & Adams, P. (2019). Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand. Department of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Office of Research Services, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, 26(3), 176–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1608190

Koepsell, D., Brinkman, W. P., & Pont, S. (2014). Human research ethics committees in technical universities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614540596

Löfström, E. (2012). Students’ Ethical Awareness and Conceptions of Research Ethics. Centre for the Research and Development of Higher Education of Helsinki, 22(5), 349–361. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2012.679136

Laas, K., Taylor, S., Miller, C. Z., Brey, E. M., & Hildt, E. (2021). Views on ethical issues in research labs: A university-wide survey. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1910503

Lakeman, R., & FitzGerald, M. (2009). The ethics of suicide research: The views of ethics committee members. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 30(1), 13–19. APA PsycArticles. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.30.1.13

Lob-Hüdepohl, A. (2021). Begutachten – Beraten – Beteiligen. Zum normativen Anforderungsprofil einer Forschungsethikkommission. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 81–99). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Lombardo, G. (2017). The Social Sciences and Ethical Protocols and Standards for Research in Social Sciences Today. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 177–184). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001014

MacNeill, K., Bolt, B., Barrett, E., McPherson, M., Sierra, M., Miller, S., Ednie-Brown, P., & Wilson, C. (2021). An ethical engagement: creative practice research, the academy and professional codes of conduct. Research Ethics, 17(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120915950

Macdonald, S. (2017). Embedded Ethics and Research Integrity: A Response to ‘The Quest for Generic Ethics Principles in Social Science Research’ by David Carpenter. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 29–35). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001003

Machin, H. E., & Shardlow, S. M. (2017). Overcoming ethical barriers to research. Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739938

Mamotte, N., & Wassenaar, D. (2009). Ethics Review in a Developing Country: A Survey of South African Social Scientists’ Experiences. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(4), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2009.4.4.69

Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research 2.0: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (AoIR Ethical Decision-Making, p. 19). http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

Martino, A. S., & Schormans, A. F. (2018). When Good Intentions Backfire: University Research Ethics Review and the Intimate Lives of People Labeled with Intellectual Disabilities. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research; Vol 20, No 3 (2019): Qualitative Content Analysis I, 19(3), Art. 9. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3090

McAreavey, R., & Das, C. (2013). A Delicate Balancing Act: Negotiating with Gatekeepers for Ethical Research When Researching Minority Communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200102

Miser, W. F. (2005). Educational research--to IRB, or not to IRB? Family Medicine, 37(3), 168–173.

Mooney-Somers, J., & Olsen, A. (2017). Ethical review and qualitative research competence: Guidance for reviewers and applicants. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116677636

Morris, M. C., & Morris, J. Z. (2016). The importance of virtue ethics in the IRB. Research Ethics, 12(4), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116656023

Msoroka, M. S., & Amundsen, D. (2018). One size fits not quite all: Universal research ethics with diversity. Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739939

Ntseane, P. G. (2009). The Ethics of the Researcher-Subject Relationship: Experiences From the Field. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 295–307). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n19

Oakes, J. M. (2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research. An evaluator’s guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review, 26(5), 443–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/019384102236520

Oellers, C., & Wegner, E. (2009). Does Germany Need a (New) Research Ethics for the Social Sciences? (No. 86; RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 86). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://www.ratswd.de/download/RatSWD_WP_2009/RatSWD_WP_86.pdf

Pope, K. S., & Vetter, V. A. (1992). Ethical dilemmas encountered by members of the American Psychological Association: A national survey. American Psychologist, 47(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.3.397

Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD) (Ed.). (2017). Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften. 9(5). https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.1

Roberts, S., Brabin, L., Vail, A., Tully, M., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 4. Research Conduct. Research Ethics, 5(4), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500404

Robertson, M. (2014). The case for ethics review in the social sciences: Drawing from practice at Queen Mary University of London. Research Ethics, 10(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016113511177

Rollin, B. E. (Ed.). (2006). Ethics and Research on Human Beings. In Science and Ethics (pp. 66–98). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617218.005

Samuel, G., Ahmed, W., Kara, H., Jessop, C., Quinton, S., & Sanger, S. (2018). Is It Time to Re-Evaluate the Ethics Governance of Social Media Research? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618793773

Samuel, G., Derrick, G. E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The Ethics Ecosystem: Personal Ethics, Network Governance and Regulating Actors Governing the Use of Social Media Research Data. Minerva, 57(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09368-3

Schmaling, K. B., & Blume, A. W. (2019). Ethics Instruction Increases Graduate Students’ Responsible Conduct of Research Knowledge but not Moral Reasoning. 268–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620903190323

Schwartz, R. (2009). On Ethics in Social Science Research. In D. M. Mertens & P. Spear (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 189–197). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n12

Sellers, C., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. (2019). Reasoning “Uncharted Territory”: Notions of Expertise Within Ethics Review Panels Assessing Research Use of Social Media. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619837088

Sleat, M. (2017). Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 37–46). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001004

Speiglman, R., & Spear, P. (2009). The Role of Institutional Review Boards: Ethics: Now You See Them, Now You Don’t. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 121–134). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-handbook-of-social-research-ethics/n8.xml

Spellecy, R., Eve, A. M., Connors, E. R., Shaker, R., & Clark, D. C. (2018). The Real-Time IRB: A Collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618780803

Stern, S. (2004). Studying Adolescents Online: A Consideration of Ethical Issues. In E. Buchnan (Ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 274–287). Idea Group.

Stodden, V. (2014). Enabling Reproducibility in Big Data Research: Balancing Confidentiality and Scientific Transparency. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 112-132). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.007

Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 17(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767

Strobel, A., Zeiler, A., & Schaar, K. (2022). Der Stand der Dinge zur forschungsethischen Begutachtung in den Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter Forschenden. Berlin: Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD), RatSWD Working Paper 278/2022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.67

Tarboush, N. A., Alkayed, Z., Alzoubi, K. H., & Al-Delaimy, W. K. (2020). The understanding of research ethics at health sciences schools in Jordan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20(121). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02040-5

Thomas, J. (2004). Reexamining the Ethics of Internet Research: Facing the Challenge of Overzealous Oversight. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 187–202). P. Lang.

Tsan, M.-F., & Van Hook, H. (2022). Assessing the Quality and Performance of Institutional Review Boards: Impact of the Revised Common Rule. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(4), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221094407

Tully, M., Vail, A., Roberts, S., Brabin, L., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 3.: Sampling and Data Analysis. Research Ethics, 5(3), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500313

Utaaker Segadal, K., Fossheim, H., & Ingierd, H. (2016). Possibilities and limitations of Internet research: A legal framework. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 35–47). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3

Vail, A., Tully, M., Brabin, L., Roberts, S., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 2.: Are the Study Aims Justified and is the Design Appropriate? Research Ethics, 5(2), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500212

Vitak, J., Proferes, N., Shilton, K., & Ashktorab, Z. (2017). Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 12(5), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617725200

Von Unger, H. (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Grundsätze, Debatten und offene Fragen. In R. M´Bayo, P. Narimani, & H. Von Unger (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung (p. pp 15-39). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9_2

Von Unger, H., & Simon, D. (2016). Ethikkommissionen in den Sozialwissenschaften - Historische Entwicklungen und Internationale Kontroversen (RatSWD Working Paper No. 253). German Data Forum (RatSWD). https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/rswrswwps/rswwps253.htm

Von Unger, H., Dilger, H., & Schönhuth, M. (2016). Ethikbegutachtung in der sozial- und kulturwissenschaftlichen Forschung? Ein Debattenbeitrag aus soziologischer und ethnologischer Sicht. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2719

Wassenaar, D., & Mamotte, N. (2012). Ethical issues and ethics reviews in social science research. In M. M. Leach, M. J. Stevens, G. Lindsey, A. Ferrero, & Y. Korkut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international psychological ethics (pp. 268–282). Oxford University Press.

Wassie, L., Gebre-Mariam, S., Tarekegne, G., & Rennie, S. (2019). Enhancing ethics review of social and behavioral research: developing a review template in Ethiopia. Research Ethics, 15(3–4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119865731

Weber, D. (2021). Forschungsprozesse als ethische Lernprozesse. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 61–80). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Research Ethics. In R. D. Wimmer & J. R. Dominick (Eds.), Mass Media Research: An Introduction. (pp. 64–87). Wadsworth Cengage.

Zimmer, M. (2018). Addressing Conceptual Gaps in Big Data Research Ethics: An Application of Contextual Integrity. Social Media + Society, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768300

Ethikkommissionen

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende