Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Anonymitaet

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Barocas, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (2014). Big Data’s End Run around Anonymity and Consent. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (pp. 44–75). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107590205

Beninger, K. (2017). Social media users’ views on the ethics of social media research. In L. Sloan & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods (p. pp 57-73). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Buchanan, E. A., & Ess, C. M. (2009). Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 39(3), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/1713066.1713069

Buchanan, E. A., & Zimmer, M. (2021, January). Internet research ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-internet-research/

Burr, J., & Reynolds, P. (2010). The Wrong Paradigm? Social Research and the Predicates of Ethical Scrutiny. Research Ethics, 6(4), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600404

Burr, V., & King, N. (2012). ‘You’re in Cruel England Now!’: Teaching Research Ethics through Reality Television. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.22

Chiauzzi, E., & Wicks, P. (2019). Digital Trespass: Ethical and Terms-of-Use Violations by Researchers Accessing Data From an Online Patient Community. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), e11985. https://doi.org/10.2196/11985

Chua, S. M. (2021). Navigating conflict between research ethics and online platform terms and conditions: a reflective account. Research Ethics, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211045526

Colnerud, G. (2013). Brief report: ethical problems in research practice. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(4), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.37

Curran, D., Kekewich, M., & Foreman, T. (2019). Examining the use of consent forms to promote dissemination of research results to participants. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016118798877

Dobrick, F. M., Fischer, J., & Hagen, L. M. (Eds.). (2018). Research Ethics in the Digital Age: Ethics for the Social Sciences and Humanities in Times of Mediatization and Digitization (1st ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783658129088

Dougherty, M. V. (2021). The use of confidentiality and anonymity protections as a cover for fraudulent fieldwork data. Research Ethics, 17(4), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211018257

Dzeyk, W. (2001). Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung. Kölner Psychologische Studien, 6(1), 1–29. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/2424/1/ethdimon.pdf

Eble, M., Ziegele, M., & Jürgens, P. (2014). Forschung in geschlossenen Plattformen des Social Web. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung: Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 123–149). Herbert von Halem.

Endres, S., & Filipovic, A. (2018). „Prinzipien für Befragungen zu moralisch polarisierenden Fragestellungen“ Für das Projekt „MeKriF - Flucht als Krise. Mediale Krisendarstellung, Medienumgang und Bewältigung durch Heranwachsende am Beispiel Flucht“. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327437473_Prinzipien_fur_Befragungen_zu_moralisch_polarisierenden_Fragestellungen

Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 205630511876336. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366

Ginnis, S. (2017). Where Next for #Socialethics? In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 209–236). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002009

Golla, S., & Bäcker, M. (2020). Handreichung Datenschutz (2. vollst. überarb. Aufl.) (p. 40). RatSWD. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.50

Guenther, K. M. (2009). The politics of names: Rethinking the methodological and ethical significance of naming people, organizations, and places. Qualitative Research, 9(4), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109337872

Harris, J., & Porcellato, L. (2018). Opt-Out Parental Consent in Online Surveys: Ethical Considerations. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(3), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618766953

Heise, N. (2015). Big Data – small problems? Ethische Dimensionen der Forschung mit Online-Kommunikationsspuren. In Digitale Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (p. pp 39-58). ifpuk - Institute for Media and Communication Studies at FU Berlin. http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44045

Heise, N., & Heesen, J. (2016). Algorithmen. In Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 202-209). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_27

Heise, N., & Schmidt, J.-H. (2014). Ethik der Online-Forschung. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung. Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 519–539). von Halem.

Hibbin, R. A., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. E. (2018). From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617751510

Hochfellner, D., Muller, D., & Schmucker, A. (2014). Privacy in Confidential Administrative Micro Data: Implementing Statistical Disclosure Control in a Secure Computing Environment. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(5), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614552799

Iphofen, R. (2020). Key Topics in Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_53-1

Iphofen, R. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (1–2). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7

Jouhki, J., Lauk, E., Penttinen, M., Sormanen, N., & Uskali, T. (2016). Facebook’s Emotional Contagion Experiment as a Challenge to Research Ethics. Media and Communication, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.579

Kneuper, R. (2022). Anonymisierte Daten brauchen keinen Datenschutz – wirklich nicht? In M. Friedewald, M. Kreutzer, & M. Hansen (Eds.), Selbstbestimmung, Privatheit und Datenschutz (pp. 171–188). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33306-5_9

Krieger, B., Grubmüller, V., & Schäfer, C. (2014). Ethische Herausforderungen bei der sozialwissenschaftlichen Analyse von Social-Media-Inhalten. SWS-Rundschau, 2, 201–2016. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/48043/ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf

Lüders, M. (2016). Researching social media: Confidentiality, anonymity and reconstructing online practices. In H. Ingierd & H. Fossheim (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics. Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3

Lauber-Rönsberg, A. (2018). Data Protection Laws, Research Ethics and Social Sciences. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. 29–44). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_4

Lell, H. M. (2018). Human Rights and the Regulation of Anonymity. New Challenges to Law and Research. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. 119–127). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_12

Liang, H., & Zhu, J. J. H. (2017). Big Data, Collection of (Social Media, Harvesting). In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1–18). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0015

Locatelli, E. (2018). Ethics of Social Media Research: State of the Debate and Future Challenges. In J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, & M. M. Allen (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Internet Research (pp. 1–22). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_25-1

Lochner, B. (2018). „Kevin kann einfach auch nicht Paul heißen“ Methodologische Überlegungen zur Anonymisierung von Namen. ZQF – Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung, 18(2). https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/zqf/article/view/31580

Mühlichen, A. (2019). Informationelle Selbstbestimmung. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (2nd ed., pp. 77–88). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_5

Machin, H. E., & Shardlow, S. M. (2017). Overcoming ethical barriers to research. Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739938

Macnish, K. (2019). Privacy in Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_9-1

Mancosu, M., & Vegetti, F. (2020). What You Can Scrape and What Is Right to Scrape: A Proposal for a Tool to Collect Public Facebook Data. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 205630512094070. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120940703

Mannay, D. (2019). Creative Methods. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_21-1

Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2017). Research Ethics in Context: Decision-Making in Digital Research. In M. T. Schäfer & K. Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society: Studying Culture through Data (pp. 201–209). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011-017

Matzner, T. (2016). Anonymität. In J. Heesen (Ed.), Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 248-254). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_33

Miethe, I. (2010). Forschungsethik. In B. Friebertshäuser, A. Langer, & A. Prengel (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft (3rd ed.). Juventa.

Neuhaus, F., & Webmoor, T. (2012). Agile ethics for massified research and visualization. Information, Communication & Society, 15(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.616519

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-Research: Ethics, Security, Design, and Control in Psychological Research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161. SocINDEX with Full Text. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00254

OECD. (2016). Research Ethics and New Forms of Data for Social and Economic Research (23074957; OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 34, p. 57). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jln7vnpxs32-en

Oellers, C., & Wegner, E. (2009). Does Germany Need a (New) Research Ethics for the Social Sciences? (86; RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 86). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://www.ratswd.de/download/RatSWD_WP_2009/RatSWD_WP_86.pdf

Oliver, P. (2010). The Student’s Guide To Research Ethics (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

Pauwels, L. (2008). Taking and Using. Ethical Issues of Photographs for Research Purposes. Visual Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 243–257. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15551390802415071

Pentzold, C. (2015). Forschungsethische Prämissen und Problemfelder teilnehmenden Beobachtens auf Online-Plattformen. In A. Maireder, J. Ausserhofer, C. Schumann, & M. Taddicken (Eds.), Digitale Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 61–85). https://doi.org/10.17174/dcr.v2.0

Pflüger, A., & Dobel, H. (2014). Datenschutz in der Online-Forschung. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung: Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 485–518). Herbert von Halem Verlag.

Pickles, J. (2017). Contamination of overt data with covert data. Research Ethics, 14(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117721281

Podschuweit, N. (2021). How ethical challenges of covert observations can be met in practice. Research Ethics, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211008218

Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD). (2019). Big Data in den Sozial-, Verhaltens- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften Datenzugang und Forschungsdatenmanagement Mit Gutachten „Web Scraping in der unabhängigen wissenschaftlichen Forschung“ (Output Series, 4 (6), p. 52). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD). https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.39

Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD). (2020). Datenerhebung mit neuer Informationstechnologie. Empfehlungen zu Datenqualität und -management, Forschungsethik und Datenschutz (6 (6); RatSWD Output 6 (6)). https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.47

Roberts, S., Brabin, L., Vail, A., Tully, M., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 4. Research Conduct. Research Ethics, 5(4), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500404

Robertson, M. (2014). The case for ethics review in the social sciences: Drawing from practice at Queen Mary University of London. Research Ethics, 10(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016113511177

Samuel, G., & Buchanan, E. (2020). Guest Editorial: Ethical Issues in Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619901215

Schaar, K. (2016). Was hat die Wissenschaft beim Datenschutz künftig zu beachten? Allgemeine und spezifische Änderungen beim Datenschutz im Wissenschaftsbereich durch die neue Europäische Datenschutzgrundverordnung. RatSWD Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.19

Sloan, L., Jessop, C., Al Baghal, T., & Williams, M. (2019). Linking Survey and Twitter Data: Informed Consent, Disclosure, Security, and Archiving. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619853447

Steinhardt, I., Fischer, C., Heimstädt, M., Hirsbrunner, S. D., İkiz-Akıncı, D., Kressin, L., Kretzer, S., Möllenkamp, A., Porzelt, M., Rahal, R.-M., Schimmler, S., Wilke, R., & Wünsche, H. (2020). Das Öffnen und Teilen von Daten qualitativer Forschung: eine Handreichung (Weizenbaum Series, 6, p. S. 31). Berlin: Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society - The German Internet Institute. https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.ws/6

Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 17(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767

Surmiak, A. D. (2018). Confidentiality in Qualitative Research Involving Vulnerable Participants: Researchers’ Perspectives. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research; Vol 19, No 3 (2018): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research, 19(3/12). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3099

Taylor, J., & Pagliari, C. (2018). Mining social media data: How are research sponsors and researchers addressing the ethical challenges? Research Ethics, 14(2), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117738559

Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2017). The Ethics of Using Social Media Data in Research: A New Framework. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 189–208). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002008

Van Baalen, S. (2018). ‘Google wants to know your location’: The ethical challenges of fieldwork in the digital age. Research Ethics, 14(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750312

Van Schie, G., Westra, I., & Schäfer, M. T. (2017). Get Your Hands Dirty: Emerging Data Practices as Challenge for Research Integrity. In M. T. Schäfer & K. Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society Studying Culture through Data (pp. 183–200). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011-016

Van liempt, I., & Bilger, V. (2012). Ethical challenges in research with vulnerable migrants. In C. Vargas-Silva & E. Elgar (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Migration (pp. 451–466). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781005231.00031

Venema, R., Pfurtscheller, D., & Lobinger, K. (2020). Doing Visual Analysis Online. Forschungsethische Herausforderungen und Handlungsempfehlungen zur Analyse vernetzter Bilder. In C. Brantner, G. Götzenbrucker, K. Lobinger, & M. Schreiber (Eds.), Vernetzte Bilder: Visuelle Kommunikation in Sozialen Medien (pp. 288–310). von Halem.

Von Unger, H. (2014). Forschungsethik in der Methodenlehre: Erfahrungen aus einem Soziologie-Seminar. In R. M´Bayo (Ed.), Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung (p. pp 209-231). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9_12

Von Unger, H. (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Grundsätze, Debatten und offene Fragen. In R. M´Bayo, P. Narimani, & H. Von Unger (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung (p. pp 15-39). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9_2

Von Unger, H. (2018). Current Perspectives on Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 19, No 3 (2018): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-19.3.3155

Von Unger, H. (2018). Forschungsethik, digitale Archivierung und biographische Interviews. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung (pp. 681–693). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18171-0_57

Von Unger, H., & Narimani, P. (2012). Ethische Reflexivität im Forschungsprozess: Herausforderungen in der Partizipativen Forschung. WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP I 2012-304, Berlin. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/70197

Von Unger, H., Dilger, H., & Schönhuth, M. (2016). Ethikbegutachtung in der sozial- und kulturwissenschaftlichen Forschung? Ein Debattenbeitrag aus soziologischer und ethnologischer Sicht. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.3.2719

Von Unger, H., Narimani, P., & M´Bayo, R. (Eds.). (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Reflexivität, Perspektiven, Positionen (1st ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9

Wagner, G. G. (2017). Anmerkungen zu den vielfältigen Dimensionen einer Forschungsethik in den Sozial-, Verhaltens- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften (RatSWD Working Paper Series: Working Paper No. 265). Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.10

Watteler, O., & Ebel, T. (2019). Datenschutz im Forschungsdatenmanagement. In U. Jensen, S. Netscher, & K. Weller (Eds.), Forschungsdatenmanagement sozialwissenschaftlicher Umfragedaten (pp. 57–80). Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/84742233

Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Researching Personal Information on the Public Web: Methods and Ethics. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310378979

Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Research Ethics. In R. D. Wimmer & J. R. Dominick (Eds.), Mass Media Research: An Introduction. (pp. 64–87). Wadsworth Cengage.

Winter, C., Battis, V., & Halvani, O. (2019). Herausforderungen für die Anonymisierung von Daten. In K. David, K. Geihs, M. Lange, & G. Stumme (Eds.), INFORMATIK 2019: 50 Jahre Gesellschaft für Informatik – Informatik für Gesellschaft (pp. 339–352). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/25003

Zeni, J. (2009). Ethics and the ‘Personal’ in Action Research. In B. Somekh & S. E. Noffke (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 254–265). Sage.

Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5

Anonymitaet

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende