Literatursammlung | FeKoM -Forschungsethik in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft

Ethik

Wenn Sie die einzelnen Literatureinträge auswählen, bekommen Sie eine Zusammenfassung und weitere Informationen.

Acquisti, A. (2014). The Economics and Behavioral Economics of Privacy. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 76-95). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.005

Ahmed, W., Bath, P. A., & Demartini, G. (2017). Using Twitter as a Data Source: An Overview of Ethical, Legal, and Methodological Challenges. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 79–108). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002004

Akbaba, Y., & Wagner, C. (2021). Zur Reproduktion von Rassismus forschen: Über widersprüchliche ethische Ansprüche, Positionierungen und Loyalitäten. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 243–254). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Andrews, U. (2013). House Rules: Using the Television Series “House” to Teach Research Ethics. Communication Teacher, 27(3), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2013.782417

Angell, E. L., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2008). Style Matters: An Analysis of 100 Research Ethics Committee Decision Letters. Research Ethics, 4(3), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610800400304

Bamdad, S., Finaughty, D. A., & Johns, S. E. (2022). ‘Grey areas’: ethical challenges posed by social media-enabled recruitment and online data collection in cross-border, social science research. 18(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211045557

Barnes, C. (2009). An Ethical Agenda in Disability Research: Rhetoric or Reality? In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 458–473). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n29

Barocas, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (2014). Big Data’s End Run around Anonymity and Consent. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (pp. 44–75). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107590205

Baumrind, D. (1964). Psychology in action: some thoughts on the ethics of research: after reading Milgram’s Behavioral Study of Obedience. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 349–351). Ashgate.

Bechmann, A., & Kim, J. Y. (2019). Big Data. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_18-1

Benbunan-Fich, R. (2016). The ethics of online research with unsuspecting users: From A/B testing to C/D experimentation. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116680664

Biggs, J. S., & Marchesi, A. (2015). Information for consent: Too long and too hard to read. Research Ethics, 11(3), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115583381

Bilke, N. (2010). Kriegsberichterstattung. In C. Schicha & C. Brosda (Eds.), Handbuch Medienethik (p. pp 442-453). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92248-5_30

Bluvstein, I., Ifrah, K., Lifshitz, R., Markovitz, N., & Shmotkin, D. (2021). Vulnerability and Resilience in Sensitive Research: The Case of the Quantitative Researcher. 16(4), 396–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211027418

Borrett, D. S., Sampson, H., & Cavoukian, A. (2017). Research ethics by design: A collaborative research design proposal. Research Ethics, 13(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116673135

Brabin, L., Roberts, S., Tully, M., Vail, A., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 1.: Scientific Reviews: What Should Ethics Committees Be Looking For? Research Ethics, 5(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500109

Brown, S., Davidovic, J., & Hasan, A. (2021). The algorithm audit: Scoring the algorithms that score us. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 2053951720983865. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720983865

Bruns, A. (2019). After the ‘APIcalypse’: social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research. Information, Communication & Society, 22(11), 1544–1566. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2019.1637447

Bullock, M., & Johnson, D. (2009). The Ethics of Data Archiving: Issues From Four Perspectives. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 214–228). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/book/handbook-social-research-ethics#contents

Burbules, N. C. (2009). Privacy and New Technologies: The Limits of Traditional Research Ethics. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 537–549). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n34

Burr, V., & King, N. (2012). ‘You’re in Cruel England Now!’: Teaching Research Ethics through Reality Television. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.22

Calvey, D. (2019). Deception. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_15-1

Carpentier, R., & McGillivray, B. (2019). Protecting Participants in Clinical Trials Through Research Ethics Review. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_3-1

Cato, K. D., Bockting, W., & Larson, E. (2016). Did I Tell You That? Ethical Issues Related to Using Computational Methods to Discover Non-Disclosed Patient Characteristics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(3), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616661611

Chua, S. M. (2021). Navigating conflict between research ethics and online platform terms and conditions: a reflective account. Research Ethics, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211045526

Cooper, J. A., McNair, L., & McNair, L. (2019). Reviewing Student Research: Can We Consider Bad Science to Be Ethical? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(1), 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618816539

Corti, L., & Bishop, L. (2019). Ethical Issues in Data Sharing and Archiving. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_17-1

Curran, W. J., & Beecher, H. K. (1969). Experimentation in children: a re-examination of legal ethical principles. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 4–10). Ashgate.

Dalton-Brown, S. (2021). Personalising the dilemma: research ethics in fiction. 12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211066445

Diebel-Fischer, H. (2018). Research Ethics in the Digital Age: Fundamentals and Problems. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. pp7-21). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_2

Dietrich, J. (2005). Ethisch-Philosophische Grundlagenkompetenzen: ein Modell für Studierende und Lehrende. In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-Philosophisches Grundlagenstudium (2. Auflage, p. pp.15-32). LIT Verlag. https://www.lit-verlag.de/isbn/978-3-8258-6780-3

Dodd, S.-J. (2009). LGBTQ: Protecting Vulnerable Subjects in All Studies. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (p. 474). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n30

DuBois, J. (2006). Ethics in behavioral and social science research. In A. Smith Iltis (Ed.), Research Ethics (pp. 102–120). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203799277-12/ethics-behavioral-social-science-research-james-dubois

Dzeyk, W. (2001). Ethische Dimensionen der Online-Forschung. Kölner Psychologische Studien, 6(1), 1–29. https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/2424/1/ethdimon.pdf

Eble, M., Ziegele, M., & Jürgens, P. (2014). Forschung in geschlossenen Plattformen des Social Web. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung: Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 123–149). Herbert von Halem.

Edward, M., & Greenough, C. (2019). Queer Literacy. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_57-1

Ellis, C. (2016). Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Research With Intimate Others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947

European Commission. Directorate General for Research. (2013). Ethics for researchers: facilitating research excellence in FP7. Publications Office. 10.27777/7491

European Commission. Directorate-General for Research. (2011). European textbook on ethics in research. Publications Office. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/12567a07-6beb-4998-95cd-8bca103fcf43/language-en

Eyal, N. (2014). Using informed consent to save trust. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(7), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100490

Eynon, R., Schroeder, R., & Fry, J. (2009). New Techniques in Online Research: Challenges for Research Ethics. Twenty-First Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 4(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450140903000308

Fiesler, C., Beard, N., & Keegan, B. C. (2020). No Robots, Spiders, or Scrapers: Legal and Ethical Regulation of Data Collection Methods in Social Media Terms of Service. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 187–196. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/7290

Filipovic´, A., Klaus, E., & Strippel, C. (2016). Der Ethik-Kodex der DGPuK. Erläuterungen aus Anlass des Beitrags von Rudolf Stöber in M&K 4/2015. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2016-1-93

Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., & Feldman, L. G. (2009). Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students. Ethics & Behavior, 19(6), 496–518. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1080/10508420903275283

Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.

Forsyth, D. R. (1981). Moral judgment: The influence of ethical ideology. Personalty and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 218–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728172006

Forsyth, D. R., & Pope, W. R. (1984). Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research: Multidimensional Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1365–1375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1365

Freckelton Q. C., I. (2020). Research Misconduct. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_6-2

Fuchs, M., Heinemann, T., Heinrichs, B., Hübner, D., Kipper, J., Rottländer, K., Runkel, T., Spranger, T. M., Vermeulen, V., & Völker-Albert, M. (2010). Forschungsethik: eine Einführung. Verlag J. B. Metzler. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783476022493#aboutAuthors

Gamble, C., & Mark, M. (2009). Experiments, Quasi-Experiments, and Ethics. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 198–213). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n13

Gilbert, J.-P., Ng, V., Niu, J., & Rees, E. E. (2020). A call for an ethical framework when using social media data for artificial intelligence applications in public health research. Canada Communicable Disease Report, 169–173. https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v46i06a03

Ginnis, S. (2017). Where Next for #Socialethics? In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 209–236). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002009

Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G., & Booth, A. (2017). Attitudes Toward the Ethics of Research Using Social Media: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), 195. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082

Goldgruber, E., Ausserhofer, J., Hornmoen, H., Steensen, S., Backholm, K., Reimerth, G., Frey, E., Ottosen, R., & McInnes, C. J. (2018). Reflecting on Ethics in the Investigation of Online Communication during Emergencies. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (p. pp 157-163). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_17

Gorup, M. (2019). Ethics of Discourse Analysis. In Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_22-1

Gorup, M. (2019). Ethics of Observational Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_20-1

Graumann, S. (2011). Forschungsethik. In M. Düwell, C. Hübenthal, & M. H. Werner (Eds.), Handbuch Ethik (p. pp 252-258). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05192-9_3

Grimm, P. (2013). Werte- und Normenaspekte der Online- Medien – Positionsbeschreibung einer digitalen Ethik. In B. Thomaß (Ed.), Normativität in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. (p. pp 371-395). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19015-0_18

Guta, A., & Voronka, J. (2019). Ethical Issues in Community-Based, Participatory, and Action-Oriented Forms of Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_24-1

Hagen, S., Bishop, E. L., Koščík, M., Vavra, M., Štebe, J., Ryan, L., Payne, E., Løvlie, A. G., Rød, L.-M., Straume, Ø., & Myhren, M. H. (2019). Report on legal and ethical framework and strategies related to access, use, re-use, dissemination and preservation of social media data (6.3; p. 47). SERISS project funded under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research. https://seriss.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/D6.3-Report-on-legal-and-ethical-framework-and-strategies...__FINAL.pdf

Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3

Halavais, A. (2019). Overcoming terms of service: a proposal for ethical distributed research. Information, Communication & Society, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1627386

Hammersley, M. (2009). Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802170288

Harris, J., & Porcellato, L. (2018). Opt-Out Parental Consent in Online Surveys: Ethical Considerations. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(3), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618766953

Hartmann, D. J., & McLaughlin, O. (2018). Heuristic Patterns of Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(5), 561–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618800208

Hedges, D., & Brown, B. L. (2009). Use and Misuse of Quantitative Methods: Data Collection, Calculation, and Presentation. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 373–387). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n24

Heesen, J. (Ed.). (2016). Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (1st ed.). J. B. Metzler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7

Heise, N. (2011). „Alles neu macht das Netz?“ – Ethik der Internetforschung Eine qualitativ-heuristische Befragungsstudie. In T. Köhler (Ed.), Wissensgemeinschaften : Digitale Medien – Öffnung und Offenheit in Forschung und Lehre. (p. pp.339-341). Waxmann Verlag. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-76473

Heise, N. (2017). Warum das Rad neu erfinden? Gedanken zur Diskussion um Forschungsethik in der Kommunikationswissenschaft in Anknüpfung an den Beitrag von Daniela Schlütz und Wiebke Möhring in M&K 4/2016. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 65(4), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2017-4-766

Heise, N., & Heesen, J. (2016). Algorithmen. In Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 202-209). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_27

Heise, N., & Schmidt, J.-H. (2014). Ethik der Online-Forschung. In M. Welker, M. Taddicken, J.-H. Schmidt, & N. Jackob (Eds.), Handbuch Online-Forschung. Sozialwissenschaftliche Datengewinnung und -auswertung in digitalen Netzen (pp. 519–539). von Halem.

Helfferich, C. (Ed.). (2011). Forschungsethik, Datenschutzbestimmungen und Einwilligungserklärung. In Die Qualität qualitativer Daten Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews (pp. 190–192). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92076-4_6

Hesse-Biber, S., & Leavy, P. (2011). The Ethics of Social Research. In The Practice of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 59–86). Sage. https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/34088_Chapter4.pdf

Hibbin, R. A., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. E. (2018). From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617751510

Hofmann, B., & Holm, S. (2019). Research integrity: environment, experience, or ethos? Research Ethics, 15(3–4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119880844

Hokke, S., Hackworth, N. J., Bennetts, S. K., Nicholson, J. M., Keyzer, P., Lucke, J., Zion, L., & Crawford, S. B. (2020). Ethical Considerations in Using Social Media to Engage Research Participants: Perspectives of Australian Researchers and Ethics Committee Members. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619854629

Iphofen, R. (2017). Conclusion: Guiding the Ethics of Online Social Media Research – Adaptation or Renovation? In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 237–242). Emerald Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/S2398-601820180000002002

Iphofen, R. (2019). An Introduction to Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_62-1

Iphofen, R. (2020). Ethics and Integrity in Research: Disciplines and Professions. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_56-1

Iphofen, R. (2020). Regulating Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_52-1

Jandt, S. (2016). Informationelle Selbstbestimmung. In J. Heesen (Ed.), Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 195-202). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_26

Jennings, S. (2012). Response to Schrag: What are ethics committees for anyway? A defence of social science research ethics review. Research Ethics, 8(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016112445423

Johns, M. D., Chen, S.-L., & Hall, G. J. (Eds.). (2004). Online social research: methods, issues & ethics. P. Lang.

Johns, M. D., Hall, G. J., & Chen, S.-L. (2004). Research Paparazzi in Cyberspace: The Voices of the Researched. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 157–178). P. Lang.

Johnson, J. (1991). Some Critical Attributes of Applied Communication Research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19(4), 340–346. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889109365313

Jonas, H. (1969). Philosophical reflections on experimenting with human subjects. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Research Ethics (p. pp.11-18). Ashgate. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315244426-4/philosophical-reflections-experimenting-human-subjects-hans-jonas?context=ubx&refId=915ef2d1-ffbb-458a-8294-e915b2643a4d

Joy, P., & Littler, C. (2021). Queer considerations: Exploring the use of social media for research recruitment within LGBTQ communities. Research Ethics, 17(3), 267–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161211003021

Kämper, E. (2016). Risiken sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschung? Forschungsethik, Datenschutz und Schutz von Persönlichkeitsrechten in den Sozial- und Verhaltenswissenschaften. RatSWD Working Paper Series, 255. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.21

Köhler, D. (2005). Problemfelder der Internet-Ethik. In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-philosophisches Grundlagenstudium. 2: Ein Projektbuch (pp. 219–228). LIT Verlag.

Kaewkungwal, J., & Adams, P. (2019). Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand. Department of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Office of Research Services, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, 26(3), 176–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1608190

Karr, A. F., & Reiter, J. P. (2014). Using Statistics to Protect Privacy. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 276-295). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.017

Kingston, A. K. (2019). Feminist Research Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_64-1

Kirtley, O. J. (2022). Ethical Issues in Experience Sampling Method research. In I. Myin-Germeys & P. Kuppens (Eds.), The Open Handbook of Experience Sampling Methodology: A step-by-step guide to designing, conducting, and analyzing ESM studies (pp. 91–100). Independently published.

Kolstoe, S. E., & Holden, L. (2019). Research Involving the Armed Forces. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_27-1

Krieger, B., Grubmüller, V., & Schäfer, C. (2014). Ethische Herausforderungen bei der sozialwissenschaftlichen Analyse von Social-Media-Inhalten. SWS-Rundschau, 2, 201–2016. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/48043/ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-sws-2014-2-krieger_et_al-Ethische_Herausforderungen_bei_der_sozialwissenschaftlichen.pdf

Kritikos, M. (2019). Research Ethics Governance. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_1-1

Kvalnes, Ø. (Ed.). (2020). Digital Dilemmas: Exploring Social Media Ethics in Organizations (1. Edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45927-7

Löfström, E. (2012). Students’ Ethical Awareness and Conceptions of Research Ethics. Centre for the Research and Development of Higher Education of Helsinki, 22(5), 349–361. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2012.679136

Laas, K., Taylor, S., Miller, C. Z., Brey, E. M., & Hildt, E. (2021). Views on ethical issues in research labs: A university-wide survey. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1910503

Lakeman, R., & FitzGerald, M. (2009). The ethics of suicide research: The views of ethics committee members. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 30(1), 13–19. APA PsycArticles. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.30.1.13

Leavy, P. (2017). Ethics in Social Research. In P. Leavy (Ed.), Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches (pp. 34–55). The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12276

Legewie, N., & Nassauer, A. (2018). YouTube, Google, Facebook: 21st Century Online Video Research and Research Ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol 19, No 3 (2018): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-19.3.3130

Lenk, H., & Maring, M. (2005). Wissenschaftsethik: Verantwortung der Wissenschaftler - Neutralität der Wissenschaften. In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-Philosophisches Grundlagenstudium (2. Auflage, pp. 153–166). LIT Verlag.

Luckner, A. (2005). Wofür haben Geisteswissenschaftler Verantwortung? In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-philosophisches Grundlagenstudium. 2: Ein Projektbuch (pp. 84–95). LIT Verlag.

Mannay, D. (2019). Creative Methods. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_21-1

Marcos Miguel, N., & Noy, S. (2023). Human Subjects Research Guidelines for Undergraduate Researchers: An Analysis of Institutional Review Board (IRB) Websites at Top Liberal Arts Colleges in the United States. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15562646231190818. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646231190818

Maring, M. (Ed.). (2005). Ethisch-philosophisches Grundlagenstudium. 1: Ein Studienbuch (2. Aufl). LIT.

Maring, M. (Ed.). (2005). Ethisch-philosophisches Grundlagenstudium. 2: Ein Projektbuch. Lit.

Markham, A. (2006). Ethic as Method, Method as Ethic: A Case for Reflexivity in Qualitative ICT Research. Journal of Information Ethics, 15(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3172/JIE.15.2.37

Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research 2.0: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (AoIR Ethical Decision-Making, p. 19). http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2017). Research Ethics in Context: Decision-Making in Digital Research. In M. T. Schäfer & K. Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society: Studying Culture through Data (pp. 201–209). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011-017

Matzner, T. (2016). Anonymität. In J. Heesen (Ed.), Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 248-254). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_33

McRae, L., Ellis, K., Kent, M., & Locke, K. (2019). Privacy and the Ethics of Disability Research: Changing Perceptions of Privacy and Smartphone Use. In J. Hunsinger, M. M. Allen, & L. Klastrup (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Internet Research (pp. 1–17). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_66-1

Medvecky, F. (2018). Fairness in Knowing: Science Communication and Epistemic Justice. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1393–1408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9977-0

Medvecky, F., & Leach, J. (2019). An Ethics of Science Communication. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32116-1

Meisch, S., & Fehling, J. (2009). Ethik als Schlüsselkompetenz in Bachelor-Studiengängen Konzeptionen, Materialien, Literatur (J. Fehling, Ed.). IZEW.

Mepham, B., Kaiser, M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., & Millar, K. (2006). Ethical Matrix Manual. LEI. https://edepot.wur.nl/216589

Mertens, D. M., & Ginsberg, P. E. (Eds.). (2009). The Handbook of Social Research Ethics. SAGE Publications Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971

Metcalf, J., & Crawford, K. (2016). Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide. Big Data & Society, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716650211

Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

Msoroka, M. S., & Amundsen, D. (2018). One size fits not quite all: Universal research ethics with diversity. Research Ethics, 14(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117739939

Narimani, P. (2014). Zustimmung als Prozess: Informiertes Einverständnis in der Praxisforschung mit von Ausweisung bedrohten Drogenabhängigen. In R. M´Bayo (Ed.), Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung (p. pp 41-58). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9_3

Nelson, R. M., Beauchamp, T., Miller, V. A., Reynolds, W., Ittenbach, R. F., & Luce, M. F. (2011). The Concept of Voluntary Consent. American Journal of Bioethics, 11(8), 6–16. Academic Search Complete. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583318

Newton, J. H. (2009). Visual Representation of People and Information: Translating Lives Into Numbers, Words, and Images as Research Data. In P. E. Ginsberg & D. M. Mertens (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (p. pp 353-372). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348971.n23

Nind, M., Wiles, R., Bengry-Howell, A., & Crow, G. (2012). Methodological innovation and research ethics: forces in tension or forces in harmony? Qualitative Research, 13(6), 650–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112455042

O’Sullivan, R. (2020). Older Citizens’ Involvement in Aging Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_29-2

OECD. (2016). Research Ethics and New Forms of Data for Social and Economic Research (23074957; OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 34, p. 57). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jln7vnpxs32-en

Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., & Kıcıman, E. (2019). Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries. Frontiers in Big Data, 2, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00013

Pauwels, L. (2008). Taking and Using. Ethical Issues of Photographs for Research Purposes. Visual Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 243–257. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15551390802415071

Pentzold, C. (2015). Forschungsethische Prämissen und Problemfelder teilnehmenden Beobachtens auf Online-Plattformen. In A. Maireder, J. Ausserhofer, C. Schumann, & M. Taddicken (Eds.), Digitale Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 61–85). https://doi.org/10.17174/dcr.v2.0

Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1

Poff, D. C., & Ginley, D. S. (2019). Publication Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_61-1

Poon, J. M. L., & Ainuddin, R. A. (2011). Selected Ethical Issues in the Analysis and Reporting of Research: Survey of Business School Faculty in Malaysia. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9(4), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-011-9142-3

Quinton, S., & Reynolds, N. (2017). The Changing Roles of Researchers and Participants in Digital and Social Media Research: Ethics Challenges and Forward Directions. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 53–78). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002003

Rüdiger, S., & Dayter, D. (2017). The ethics of researching unlikeable subjects. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2/3), 251–269. Communication & Mass Media Complete. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=123562776&site=ehost-live

Rau, J., Münch, F., & Asli, M. (2021). SOCRATES: Social Media Research Assessment Template for Ethical Scholarship. 24.

Raykov, M. (2020). Education researchers’ perceptions of and experiences with the research ethics application process in Europe and beyond. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119893461

Recuber, T. (2015). From obedience to contagion: Discourses of power in Milgram, Zimbardo, and the Facebook experiment. Research Ethics, 12(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016115579533

Rekus, J. (2005). Fachunterricht und Ethik. In M. Maring (Ed.), Ethisch-Philosophisches Grundlagenstudium (2. Auflage, p. pp.141-152). LIT Verlag.

Resnik, D. B. (2019). Stewardship of research resources. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1585819

Resnik, D. B. (Ed.). (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting People, Advancing Science, Promoting Trust (1st ed., Vol. 74). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8

Richter, P. (2016). Big Data. In J. Heesen (Ed.), Handbuch Medien- und Informationsethik (p. pp 210-216). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05394-7_28

Richterich, A. (2020). Tracing controversies in hacker communities: ethical considerations for internet research. Information, Communication & Society, 23(1), 76–93. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486867

Riedel, J. (2018). Research Ethics in the Doctoral Project “Boundary Management in Social Media Communication.” In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (p. pp 153-156). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_16

Roache, R. (2014). Why is informed consent important? J Med Ethics, 40(7), 435–436. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102264

Roberts, D. (2018). ‘Getting What They Deserve’: Digital Media Readers Comment on the Cause of Detroit’s Bankruptcy. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (p. pp 107-110). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_10

Roberts, J., Overstreet, K., Hendrick, R., & Mahar, J. (2020). Peer Review in Scholarly Journal Publishing. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_5-1

Roberts, S., Brabin, L., Vail, A., Tully, M., & McNamee, R. (2009). Methodological Considerations in Ethical Review — 4. Research Conduct. Research Ethics, 5(4), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500404

Rollin, B. E. (Ed.). (2006). Ethics and Research on Human Beings. In Science and Ethics (pp. 66–98). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617218.005

Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2011). Ethical Principles in Data Analysis: An Overview. In A. T. Panter & S. K. Sterba (Eds.), Handbook of Ethics in Quantitative Methodology (pp. 37–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840023.ch3

Roth, W.-M. (2018). A Transactional Approach to Research Ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3061

Sacco, D. F., Bruton, S. V., & Brown, M. (2018). In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists’ Engagement in Questionable Research Practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617743834

Salmons, J. (2017). Getting to Yes: Informed Consent in Qualitative Social Media Research. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 109–134). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002005

Samuel, G., & Buchanan, E. (2020). Guest Editorial: Ethical Issues in Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619901215

Samuel, G., Ahmed, W., Kara, H., Jessop, C., Quinton, S., & Sanger, S. (2018). Is It Time to Re-Evaluate the Ethics Governance of Social Media Research? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618793773

Sarangi, S. (2015). Communication research ethics and some paradoxes in qualitative inquiry. Journal of Applied Linguistics & Professional Practice, 12(1), 94–121. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.36885

Sawyer, J. S., Wilner, L. L., & Brewster, M. E. (2017). Ethics in Gender Research. In K. L. Nadal (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Psychology and Gender (pp. 506–508). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384269.n170

Saxena, A. (2019). Science and Ethics—Merging the Boundaries. In A. Saxena, Ethics in Science (pp. 1–16). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9009-9_1

Schöpfel, J., Azeroual, O., & Jungbauer-Gans, M. (2020). Research Ethics, Open Science and CRIS. Publications, 8(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8040051

Schaar, K. (2016). Was hat die Wissenschaft beim Datenschutz künftig zu beachten? Allgemeine und spezifische Änderungen beim Datenschutz im Wissenschaftsbereich durch die neue Europäische Datenschutzgrundverordnung. RatSWD Working Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.19

Schaarschmidt, N. (2018). Media Ethics in Research on Video-Based Mental Health Care. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (pp. 137–142). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_14

Schlütz, D., & Möhring, W. (2016). Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Forschungsethik – Sonntagsworte, Selbstzweck, Notwendigkeit? Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2016-4-483

Sellers, C., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. (2019). Reasoning “Uncharted Territory”: Notions of Expertise Within Ethics Review Panels Assessing Research Use of Social Media. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619837088

Sidze, S. M., Köhler, T., & Szarzynski, J. (2018). Ethical Issues in Collecting Data from Informant of the Field. In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research Ethics in the Digital Age (p. pp 101-104). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_9

Sims, J. (2019). Ethical Research with Hard-to-Reach Groups. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (p. pp 1-14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_32-1

Singer, E. (1978). The Effect of Informed Consent Procedures on Respondents’ Reactions to Surveys. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(1), 49–57. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/208713

Singer, E. (1984). Public Reactions to Some Ethical Issues of Social Research: Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 501–509. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1086/208986

Sold, M., & Junk, J. (2021). Researching Extremist Content on Social Media Platforms: Data Protection and Research Ethics Challenges and Opportunities. Global Network on Extremism & Technology.

Steen-Johnsen, K., & Enjolras, B. (2016). Social research and Big Data – the tension between opportunities and realities. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 122–140). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3

Stern, J. E., & Elliott, D. (1997). The ethics of scientific research : A guidebook for course development. 75. https://digital.stpetersburg.usf.edu/fac_publications/1910

Stern, S. R. (2003). Encountering Distressing Information in Online Research: A Consideration of Legal and Ethical Responsibilities. New Media & Society, 5(2), 249–266. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444803005002006

Stewart, C. N., & Jr. Stewart, C. N. (2011). Chapter 1: Research Ethics: The Best Ethical Practices Produce the Best Science. In Research Ethics for Scientists: A Companion for Students (pp. 1–9). Wiley & Sons. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/dortmundtech/detail.action?docID=819276

Stodden, V. (2014). Enabling Reproducibility in Big Data Research: Balancing Confidentiality and Scientific Transparency. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 112-132). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205.007

Strandburg, K. (2014). Monitoring, Datafication, and Consent: Legal Approaches to Privacy in the Big Data Context. In J. Lane, V. Stodden, S. Bender, & H. Nissenbaum (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (p. pp 5-43). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107590205.003

Strobel, A., Zeiler, A., & Schaar, K. (2022). Der Stand der Dinge zur forschungsethischen Begutachtung in den Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter Forschenden. Berlin: Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD), RatSWD Working Paper 278/2022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17620/02671.67

Surmiak, A. D. (2018). Confidentiality in Qualitative Research Involving Vulnerable Participants: Researchers’ Perspectives. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research; Vol 19, No 3 (2018): Research Ethics in Qualitative Research, 19(3/12). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3099

Sutrop, M., & Louk, K. (2020). Informed Consent and Ethical Research. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_8-1

Sutrop, M., Prader, M.-L., & Juurik, M. (2020). Research Ethics Codes and Guidelines. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_2-1

Swirsky, E. S., Hoop, J. G., & Labott, S. (2014). Using Social Media in Research: New Ethics for a New Meme? American Journal of Bioethics, 14(10), 60–61. Academic Search Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.948302

Tännsjö, T. (2014). Utilitarianism and informed consent. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(7), 445. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101206

Tarboush, N. A., Alkayed, Z., Alzoubi, K. H., & Al-Delaimy, W. K. (2020). The understanding of research ethics at health sciences schools in Jordan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20(121). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02040-5

Taylor, J., & Pagliari, C. (2018). Mining social media data: How are research sponsors and researchers addressing the ethical challenges? Research Ethics, 14(2), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117738559

Thomas, J. (2004). Reexamining the Ethics of Internet Research: Facing the Challenge of Overzealous Oversight. In M. D. Johns, G. J. Hall, & S.-L. Chen (Eds.), Online social research: methods, issues & ethics (pp. 187–202). P. Lang.

Tolich, M., Tumilty, E., Choe, L., Hohmann-Marriott, B., & Fahey, N. (2019). Researcher Emotional Safety as Ethics in Practice. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_26-1

Torrence, B. S., Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., Turner, M. R., Todd, E. M., Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, S. (2017). Curricular Approaches in Research Ethics Education: Reflecting on More and Less Effective Practices in Instructional Content. Accountability in Research, 24(5), 269–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1276452

Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social Media Research: A Guide to Ethics. The University of Aberdeen. https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_487729_smxx.pdf

Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2017). The Ethics of Using Social Media Data in Research: A New Framework. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 189–208). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002008

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technologyand Technology Directorate, Cyber Security Division Directorate, Bailey, M., Burstein, A., Claffy, K., Clayman, S., Dittrich, D., Heidemann, J., Kenneally, E., Maughan, D., McNeill, J., Neumann, P., Scheper, C., Tien, L., Papadopoulos, C., Visscher, W., & Westby, J. (2012). The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/st-menlo-report

Utaaker Segadal, K., Fossheim, H., & Ingierd, H. (2016). Possibilities and limitations of Internet research: A legal framework. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet Research Ethics (pp. 35–47). Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing (NOASP). https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3

Vallor, S. (2021). Social Networking and Ethics. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/ethics-social-networking/

Van Schie, G., Westra, I., & Schäfer, M. T. (2017). Get Your Hands Dirty: Emerging Data Practices as Challenge for Research Integrity. In M. T. Schäfer & K. Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society Studying Culture through Data (pp. 183–200). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011-016

Van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2017). About ‘Othering’ Ourselves in a System with Discrepant Values: The Research Ethics Review Process Today. In Ron Iphofen (Ed.), Finding Common Ground : Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences: Vol. First edition (pp. 61–75). Emerald Publishing Limited; eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820170000001007

Van den Scott, L.-J. K. (2020). Sociology and Ethics. In R. Iphofen (Ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_68-1

Von Unger, H. (2014). Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung: Grundsätze, Debatten und offene Fragen. In R. M´Bayo, P. Narimani, & H. Von Unger (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der qualitativen Forschung (p. pp 15-39). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04289-9_2

Wöhlke, S., & Schicktanz, S. (2019). Special Issue: Why Ethically Reflect on Empirical Studies in Empirical Ethics? Case Studies and Commentaries. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(5), 424–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619862395

Warfield, K., Hoholuk, J., Vincent, B., & Camargo, A. D. (2019). Pics, Dicks, Tits, and Tats: negotiating ethics working with images of bodies in social media research. New Media & Society, 21(9), 2068–2086. Communication & Mass Media Complete. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819837715

Wesselmann, C., & Schallenberger, C. (2021). Herausforderungen beim Feldzugang zu Menschen mit Lernschwierigkeiten mit Blick auf informierte Einwilligung. In J. Franz & U. Unterkofler (Eds.), Forschungsethik in der Sozialen Arbeit: Prinzipien und Erfahrungen (pp. 181–192). Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kr4n3n.16

Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M. (2011). Researching Personal Information on the Public Web: Methods and Ethics. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310378979

Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., & Sloan, L. (2017). Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation. Sociology, 51(6), 1149–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517708140

Williamson, V., Murphy, D., Castro, C., Vermetten, E., Jetly, R., & Greenberg, N. (2021). Moral injury and the need to carry out ethically responsible research. Research Ethics, 17(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120969743

Willis, R. (2019). Observations online: Finding the ethical boundaries of Facebook research. Research Ethics, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117740176

Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Research Ethics. In R. D. Wimmer & J. R. Dominick (Eds.), Mass Media Research: An Introduction. (pp. 64–87). Wadsworth Cengage.

Woodfield, K., & Iphofen, R. (2017). Introduction to Volume 2: The Ethics of Online Research. In K. Woodfield (Ed.), The Ethics of Online Research (pp. 1–12). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002013

Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2018). Framing “Deception” and “Covertness” in Research: Do Milgram, Humphreys, and Zimbardo Justify Regulating Social Science Research Ethics? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3), Art. 15. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3102

Zainab, S., Mansoor, M., & Gul, U. (2023). Self-Restrictions among Media Researchers in Global South and Regional Priorities: Challenges for Freedom of Expression and Ethical Research. Comunicazioni Sociali, 2, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.26350/001200_000186

Zwitter, A. (2014). Big Data ethics. Big Data & Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714559253

Ethik

FeKoMForschungsethik in der Kommunikations-
und Medienwissenschaft

Mitwirkende